Posted on Friday March 27th by Jebediah Reed | 1,996

china-subway

To give some sense of the pace of public works construction in China, the city of Guangzhou is planning to open 83 miles of new subway lines by the end of next year. Meanwhile, New York–a city of about the same size–has been playing around with the 1.7-mile Second Avenue line for decades now. China also builds subways rather cheaply–$100 million per mile versus $2.4 billion per mile in the Big Apple.

Not surprisingly, projects there are more aggressive in all respects: there are 60 tunnel boring machines operating in Guangzhou, while only one is slated for the Second Avenue project; workers put in five 12-hour shifts a week (and if they don’t like it, they can go pound glacial till); and seizing property is a breeze.

An article in the Business section of today’s NY Times takes a smart look at the forces at play as China goes on a transit infrastructure  spending spree while it simultaneously becomes evermore sprawling and car-centric.

Here’s one interesting passage, though the story is worth reading in its entirety:

“Nobody is building like they are,” said Shomik Mehndiratta, a World Bank specialist in urban transport. “The center of construction is really China.”

Western mass transit experts applaud China for investing billions in systems that will put less stress on the environment and on cities. But they warn that other Chinese policies, like allowing real estate developers to build sprawling new suburbs, undermine the benefits of the mass transit boom.

“They wind up better than if they did nothing, but it costs them a fortune,” said Lee Schipper, a specialist at Stanford in urban transport.

Mr. Chan defended Guangzhou’s combination of cars and subways, saying that the city built a subway line to a new Toyota assembly plant to help employees and suppliers reach it.

Subways have been most competitive in cities like New York that have high prices for parking, and tolls for bridges and tunnels, discouraging car use. Few Chinese cities have been willing to follow suit, other than Shanghai, which charges a fee of several thousand dollars for each license plate.

The cost and physical limitations of subways have discouraged most cities from building new ones. For instance, only Tokyo has a subway system that carries more people than its buses. The buses are cheaper and able to serve far more streets but move more slowly, pollute more and contribute to traffic congestion.

China has reason to worry. It surpassed the United States in total vehicle sales for the first time in January, although the United States remained slightly ahead in car sales. But in February, China overtook the United States in both, in part because the global downturn has hurt auto sales much more in the United States than in China.

There are are many countervaling forces at work. China has passed its own stimulus package and the government is eager to put people to work, create economic activity, and build modern infrastructure. The Guangzhou project is part of major national transit buildout. But the nation’s cities are also sprawling beasts, and in that sense, more suited to cars than trains. Not shockingly, many Chinese prefer the former.

(Photo: Reinhard Krause, Reuters)

6 Responses to “Building A Subway Is 96 Percent Cheaper In China”

  1. March 2009 TunnelProject TunnelNews and Tunnel Projects | tunnelproject.com Says:

    [...] Building A Subway Is 96 Percent Cheaper In China » INFRASTRUCTURIST China also builds subways rather cheaply–$100 million per mile versus $2.4 billion per mile in the Big Apple. Not surprisingly, projects there are more aggressive in all respects: there are 60 tunnel boring machines operating [...]

  2. Norman F. Anderson Says:

    This is an extraordinary figure, if true. Do you have other figures in terms of cost per kilometer?
    - highways
    - light rail
    - transmission lines
    These ‘bang for the buck’ figures are fundamental to the debate, but cannot be found anywhere. Do you have similar figures for Europe? Thank you.

  3. Chinese Rail Investment Is Kind Of Humiliating To U.S. » INFRASTRUCTURIST Says:

    [...] A little context here: The US–a country with a per capita GDP about 16 times that of China–has set rail as a national priority and has committed… $13 billion. Or, about 2 percent as much in China. This, of course, is in a place where it costs a hell of a lot more to get anything done. [...]

  4. Chinese High-Speed Rail Plan Makes U.S. Look A Little Silly | Transport Gooru Says:

    [...] $13 billion. Or, about 2 percent as much in China. This, of course, is in a place where it costs a hell of a lot more to get anything done.   In the U.S., President Obama’s decision to make high-speed passenger rail service a [...]

  5. What happens when the truck and oil lobby is stronger « Stocks Go Up. Stocks Go Down. Says:

    [...] A little context here: The US–a country with a per capita GDP about 16 times that of China–has set rail as a national priority and has committed… $13 billion. Or, about 2 percent as much in China. This, of course, is in a place where it costs a hell of a lot more to get anything done. [...]

  6. Andy Says:

    What this article didn’t mention is that this subway is for average joe who can’t afford cars and a suburb house. If a communist country has no problem to let the middle and upper classes to have a house in a suburban and to have a car, why the media from capitalist nations complain so much?

Post a comment: