Today, the Reason Foundation, a libertarian think tank, released its 19th Annual Highway Report. It takes an unusually sunny view on U.S. infrastructure as a whole, relying on data such as traffic fatalities in 2008 fell to their lowest levels since the 1960s (a decrease that is mostly explained by decreases in driving due to the recession), the percentage of congested urban Interstates fell below 50% for the first time since 2000 (also the recession), and 23.7% of U.S. bridges — the lowest percentage since 1984 — were structurally deficient or functionally obsolete (though this doesn’t mean much either — fewer obsolete bridges doesn’t mean more safe bridges).
Overall, the data appears to be sound — it’s the interpretation of it where things go awry. The report makes the sweeping statement that its results indicate that state highway conditions are the best they’ve been in 19 years. Which simply doesn’t follow, when you look at where these conclusions are coming from:
“We’re seeing several factors combine to produce significant improvement in highway conditions,” said David T. Hartgen, author of the report and emeritus professor of transportation studies at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. “Over the last several years, states invested a lot more money to improve pavement and bridges. Spending increased 8 percent from 2007 to 2008, and per-mile spending on state roads has almost tripled since 1984, so you’d hope and expect to see improved performance.”
Ok, except that the report then goes on to essentially null this statement by highlighting the skewed relationship between spending and actual results. In the rankings of most cost-effective state roads, the bottom 15 states basically make up around 90% of the U.S. driving public. New Jersey, which came in at a miserable 45th in the cost-effectiveness rankings, spends dramatically more than every other state on its roads — $1.1 million per mile, to be exact. Florida, ranked 39th, was the second biggest spender, spending $671,000 per mile, while California, ranked 48th, came in at third with $545,000 per mile. In other words, higher spending in no way automatically equals better roads.
There’s also this bit of info, which comes as less than no surprise:
California also squanders a massive amount of transportation money that never makes it onto roads, spending $93,464 in administrative costs for every mile of state road. New York ($89,194 per mile), Massachusetts ($71,982), and New Jersey ($62,748) also compare poorly to states like Texas ($6,529) and Virginia ($6,370) that spend dramatically less on administrative costs.
Then there’s the simply irony of the report as a whole: The largest libertarian group in the country is arguing that an increase in state government spending on infrastructure has led to safer, less crowded roads, despite the fact that many of these states have proved themselves totally incapable of spending their money wisely. So is the implication here that the federal government doesn’t need to step in?






• The U.S. Border Patrol has quietly started boarding Amtrak trains near the Canada-U.S. border, and looking for undocumented immigrants. (
• With Dubai having lost some of its glitter in the last year, an interesting book review looks at three new books about the desert city. (
• The success of Portland’s streetcar system is leading other U.S. cities to try to get federal grants to start streetcars of their own. (
We here at Infrastructurist are firm believers in standing behind smart ideas, no matter what group or party they happen to come from. In this case, they’re coming from the American Conservative. The bastion of modern conservatism has launched an online symposium, featuring prominent urban studies experts like the Brookings Institute’s
• The epic floods inflicting Pakistan are tearing up huge swathes of its infrastructure. (
• A new report from the Center for Urban infrastructure, details the benefits of building a mass inter-city high-speed rail system for Southern California — and offers some surprising insights. (
• Michael Grunwald has a great piece looking at President Obama’s Recovery Act and how it’s transforming America. (
Libertarianism, in its purest form, could arguably be called an enemy of infrastructure. If the government is disabled and left a shallow, broke, impotent shell, then exactly who will build the roads, bridges, and public works that allow our society, and economy, to function? (If your stock answer is “The private sector! To hell with government!” then we’ve got about a library of stuff for you to read.
• In the five years after Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans has spent $15 billion on infrastructure to help protect the city, including pumps, levees, flood walls and gates. (
It’s the kind of perfect storm that anyone who lives in (or has lived in) a city can relate to: The Long Island Rail Road, New Jersey Transit, and Amtrak all broke down (or, at least, were severely delayed) this morning. In other words, anyone from Long Island, New Jersey, or Pennsylvania who wanted to take the train to work in New York City this morning was seriously out of luck.
• The owners of the Empire State Building are protesting the height of a proposed skyscraper competitor which would significantly alter the Manhattan skyline. (
This is not a joke (in fact, we wish it was): A recent traffic jam on the main road to Beijing kept Chinese drivers in gridlocked traffic — for nine days straight. According to
• In the midst of controversy over the Islamic center in Lower Manhattan, an article looks at the status of rebuilding at the World Trade Center site. (




