Posts Tagged ‘Partisan Heat’

Conservative Mag Tells Conservatives Why They Should Care About Public Transit

Monday, August 30th, 2010

american-conservativeWe here at Infrastructurist are firm believers in standing behind smart ideas, no matter what group or party they happen to come from. In this case, they’re coming from the American Conservative. The bastion of modern conservatism has launched an online symposium, featuring prominent urban studies experts like the Brookings Institute’s Christopher Leinberger and the president of the Congress for the New Urbanism, John Norquist, to explore the many reasons why conservatives should support public transit. Next month, the nonprofit parent of AC magazine, the American Ideas Institute, will launch a new center on transportation made possible by a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation.

The collection contains a multitude of interesting pieces, including by familiar names like William Lind (who as you may recall has been featured in two Q&A’s with us on this very topic). They present many ideas that we’ve explored in the past, like the economic and environmental need for our attitudes about daily transportation to change as a nation, the poor management decisions and other factors that add huge price tags to rail projects, and the power of transportation to revive a region’s economy, livability, and connectivity.

These are not necessarily new arguments, but the ideas they contain are compulsory reading for anyone who wants to have a serious discussion about the future of transportation policy, and priorities, in this country. And so we say, bravo American Conservative for facilitating a rational and fact-driven discussion among the demographic that, well, needs it most.

Critics: HSR Will Fail Because the Federal Railroad Administration’s Too Small

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

bureaucracyWe’ve discussed some ways high speed rail in the U.S. could be going astray - such as failing to connect HSR lines to commuter lines, and thereby making it unduly hard for anyone to actually use the service. But critics of the government’s plans for HSR — and the administration behind them — are charging that the decision-making agency that awarded all that federal cash is and was fatally flawed.

According to some government investigators and critics in Congress (nearly all of whom are Republicans) the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), the agency charged with managing the $8 billion handed out last month, is woefully understaffed and was not equipped to adequately review the 214 applications submitted for funds. These critics also assert that the employees the FRA does have are not exactly experts in overseeing massive HSR projects: Until now, the agency’s primary function has been maintaining the safety of existing freight and passenger railroads.

Rep. John Mica of Florida, the top Republican on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, made a particularly strident statement, calling the award process “amateur hour,” and charging the FRA with not consulting enough with elected officials and devoting too much of the money to Amtrak improvements.

But while there’s little doubt the FRA has had probably the busiest few months in its existence, it’s hard to see how its staffing was so inadequate as to completely corrupt the awards process. A report by the Transportation Department inspector general states the agency brought in staff from other departments to get the applications reviewed and the money awarded by February 2010 — which was an enormous accomplishment given the complexity of the applications and the relatively small number of projects that won funding.

There’s also the fact that the existing FRA wasn’t tiny to begin with — it currently boasts 917 employees. (more…)

The Week in High Speed Rail

Friday, March 5th, 2010

cute-train• Conclusions from the High Speed Rail 2010 conference in Orlando: HSR’s success in the U.S. lies in “effectively promoting and selling it as a safe, convenient, environmentally friendly mode of transportation.” Yeah, that and actually providing the product we’re selling. (Ledger)

• In response to claims that it exaggerated projected ridership and went through a flawed peer-review process, the California High-Speed Rail Authority on Thursday published an eight-page response defending their model, which forecasts that 41 million people will ride the L.A.–San Francisco line by 2030. (MercuryNews)

• “America’s foray into high speed rail should include NYC.” Ahh if only! (PennLive)

• Ray LaHood’s visit with Senate appropriators got testy yesterday, when Republican Sen. Kit Bond tore into him to defend the White House’s plans for sustainable development and high speed rail. LaHood stood fast and held his own. (StreetsBlogDC)

Wait, campus protests for…public transit? Students at the University of Oregon rallied this week for light rail, drawing praise from a State Representative who’s working with the Oregon Legislature to find funding for rail-line repairs and increase train speeds to 65 miles per hour. (KMTR)

• Wisconsin’s largest business groupgot itself into some hot water with claims that the $823 million awarded to Wisconsin and Minnesota by the federal government “made some sense.” The only problem? Both leading Republican gubernatorial candidates are pro-halting HSR if tawpayers wind up having to pay any operating costs. (JSOnline)