Archive for the ‘public transit’ Category

Conservative Mag Tells Conservatives Why They Should Care About Public Transit

Monday, August 30th, 2010

Warning: file_get_contents(http://services.digg.com/stories?link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.infrastructurist.com%2F2010%2F08%2F30%2Fconservative-mag-tells-conservatives-why-they-should-care-about-public-transit%2F&appkey=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.infrastructurist.com&type=php) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.0 503 Service Unavailable in /home/groupsjr/infrastructurist.com/wp-content/plugins/diggz-et/options/digg-api.php on line 61

american-conservativeWe here at Infrastructurist are firm believers in standing behind smart ideas, no matter what group or party they happen to come from. In this case, they’re coming from the American Conservative. The bastion of modern conservatism has launched an online symposium, featuring prominent urban studies experts like the Brookings Institute’s Christopher Leinberger and the president of the Congress for the New Urbanism, John Norquist, to explore the many reasons why conservatives should support public transit. Next month, the nonprofit parent of AC magazine, the American Ideas Institute, will launch a new center on transportation made possible by a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation.

The collection contains a multitude of interesting pieces, including by familiar names like William Lind (who as you may recall has been featured in two Q&A’s with us on this very topic). They present many ideas that we’ve explored in the past, like the economic and environmental need for our attitudes about daily transportation to change as a nation, the poor management decisions and other factors that add huge price tags to rail projects, and the power of transportation to revive a region’s economy, livability, and connectivity.

These are not necessarily new arguments, but the ideas they contain are compulsory reading for anyone who wants to have a serious discussion about the future of transportation policy, and priorities, in this country. And so we say, bravo American Conservative for facilitating a rational and fact-driven discussion among the demographic that, well, needs it most.


An Infrastructure Perfect Storm: New York Trains Shut Down En Masse

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

amtrak-breakdownIt’s the kind of perfect storm that anyone who lives in (or has lived in) a city can relate to: The Long Island Rail Road, New Jersey Transit, and Amtrak all broke down (or, at least, were severely delayed) this morning. In other words, anyone from Long Island, New Jersey, or Pennsylvania who wanted to take the train to work in New York City this morning was seriously out of luck.

It all started yesterday, when a small fire broke out in a control tower at Jamaica Station, the hub for 10 of the railroad’s 11 branches traveling in and out of New York City. The fire proceeded to wreak havoc on the LIRR’s switches, an antediluvian (well, almost — it was built in 1913) system of levers and pulleys. As a result, there was no way to direct trains onto their proper routes, so the entire railroad ground to a halt as workers rushed around the tracks, manually locking the switches into place. Ironically, a new computerized signal system is scheduled to be installed this year — but it hasn’t been yet.

While around 75% of LIRR service had been restored this morning, thousands of passengers were still left stranded. And on the other side of Manhattan, just about every train commuter in New Jersey woke up to a virtual nightmare: A power shortage along Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor had caused the halting of every train on the line, from Maryland’s MARC to New Jersey Transit’s North Jersey Coast Line and Midtown Direct trains. Trains along the Northeast Corridor were completely motionless between 7:45 and 8:45 a.m. — prime rush hour. The cause of the outage, which occurred somewhere between Washington and Perryville, Maryland, was hazy — officials said it looked like a tripped circuit breaker — but the results were dire. Because of the low voltage, all NJT trains were stopped. Some trains totally lost power, including lights and air conditioning. Service was, for the most part, back up and running by 10 AM, but the ripple effects are still being felt along the line.

Yes, it’s a cliche, but we can’t help but bring up the classic infrastructure idiom: No one pays attention to it until it breaks down. Well, here, in a morning of intense karma, we have a trifecta of breakdowns that have stranded millions of people. Needless to say, if we had updated our trains and the technology we use to run them, these problems wouldn’t be so endemic (and they are — the last Amtrak power outage was all of 2 weeks ago, the result of a tree falling on power lines). Yes, Obama has pledged $112 million of the high-speed rail stimulus money to updating the Northeast Corridor — but that’s really just dipping a toe in the water. We cannot expect our urban areas to function, or to sustain economic and social growth, without a functioning and modern system of public transportation. And here is the universe nailing that point home, hard.

Will Walkability Scores Affect How Much You Pay For a Home?

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

walkscore

You may remember Walk Score — the service that calculates the walkability of a neighborhood or location (shown above). Specifically, it measures and rates the number of destinations, including libraries, parks and coffee shops, within walking distance of a home, using a a 100-point scale.

And now, the developers of Walk Score are launching a correspondent tool, called Transit Score, that uses transit agency scheduling data to create a new index. This time, it rates how good the public transit service is for any property in the U.S., taking into account factors like how far you’d have to walk to get to the nearest bus/train stop, and how often buses and trains arrive once you do get there. The creators of Walk Score, a company called Front Seat, have also partnered with Chicago’s Center for Neighborhood Technology to release an app that calculates exactly how much you spend on transportation, no matter what form you use.

So are apps like this getting big enough to guide decisions on home-buying?

Front Seat has certainly been working on it. Specifically, they’ve been targeting their index toward real estate listings, in a push to get homebuyers to begin factoring walkability — and now, public transit usability — into actual home purchases. Walk scores are now visible on around 3 million listings a day on sites like Zillow. Granted, whether they’re driving or discouraging purchases remains to be seen: As Matt Lerner, the Chief Technology Officer of Front Seat, told us, “It’s very hard for us to measure the impact of [Walk Scores] on actual purchases. We haven’t isolated the impact yet.” Some data has shown that homes with high Walk Scores command higher prices, but a clear link between the two has yet to be drawn.

In other words, the data isn’t there yet. But give it a few years, and some may be available — Walk Scores are most common in urban areas, which tend to have a large volume of real estate turnover. And as home buyers start to realize that the old tropes — like “suburbs are cheaper” — simply aren’t true, and that transportation can seriously suck up your budget, perhaps they’ll start choosing homes accordingly.

Here Come the NYC Bus Lanes!

Thursday, August 12th, 2010

bus-lane

We’ve written about the radical “Bus Only” lanes being designated in New York City — and now here they are! This photo was taken yesterday at First Avenue near 88th Street in Manhattan. According to our tipster, ” I think they are moving south from there; I spotted signs at 89th, 91st and 92nd Street as well.” Vive la bus!

Image courtesy of Justin Hunter

The Morning Dig: Why Moscow’s Traffic Is So Abysmal

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

• To accompany its article on the subject, the New Yorker produced this interesting video on Moscow’s traffic.

• China is investing heavily in building cities in its interior, but many of the buildings in this construction boom are not being used. (Reuters)

• The suburb of Rockville, Maryland is seen as an model for “smart growth” of the future of real estate. (Reuters)

• As the U.S. military leaves Iraq, it is involved in a major logistical effort to ship millions of items back home or to Afghanistan. (AP)

• India’s cities are growing quickly, but its infrastructure is not up to the task of accommodating its people. (Reuters)

• A new survey finds that nine in ten teens are still driving while distracted — which often means texting behind the wheel. (USA Today)

• The Turkish city of Istanbul is doing reasonably well as its population increases every year. (CitiWire)

When Transportation and Religion Collide: Muslim Ads on the Bus

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

muslims-for-peace1Politics and infrastructure are bound to collide in innumerable ways. On a metaphysical level, the two have nothing in common — one is a body of ideas resting on a set of subjective principles, the other is, well, a set of roads, bridges, buildings, etc. But the two nonetheless can’t really exist in modern society without finding themselves intertwined. And nowhere are these messy collisions more apparent than in cases where religious groups take out ads on public transit.

In the latest case in New York City, the religious group is Muslims for Peace and the medium for the ad is 90 public buses. The ad, which will appear through the end of this week reads “Love for all. Hatred for none. 1-800-WHY-ISLAM” — not exactly the most inflammatory statement, but nonetheless enough to offend.

The ads will run on buses in Queens, Manhattan and the Bronx, and have ruffled plenty of feathers. The MTA has heard plenty of complaints, including demands that religious advertising be banned from public transit (though given the state of the MTA’s budget, it’s not likely that they’re going to turn down ad dollars anytime soon). To thicken the plot, these billboards come on the heels of another religion-tinged ad campaign that read: “Fatwa on your head? Leaving Islam? RefugefromIslam.com.”

This isn’t the first time that religious ads on the MTA, which allows any ad that isn’t offensive or that doesn’t promote an illegal activity, have caused a kerfuffle — in 2006, a set of “Jesus for Jews” posters in the Times Square subway caused uproar, and in 2009 the atheist group the Big Apple Coalition of Reason raised eyebrows with an ad reading, “A million New Yorkers are good without God. Are you?”  (more…)

Will New York’s Bus Rapid Transit System Cause a Bus Revolution?

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010

mta-2nd-ave-busVive la bus! The biggest non-rail form of mass transit has long suffered from an image problem, but now buses are beginning to see a comeback.

The resurgence stems, at least in part, from current economic realities — more people are moving to urban areas, requiring more need for mass transit, and trains are extremely expensive to build and maintain. Starting up and running a bus line, meanwhile, is a fraction of the cost.

There’s still the age-old “buses aren’t sexy” problem, which has always been grounded more in perception than reality — the stigma of “riding the bus” has all sorts of sociological roots that, at the end of the day, don’t have a shred of relevance to today’s modern-day commuter. Whether or not it’s traditionally been cool, the bus makes sense — and as we’ve always said, when transportation consumers are presented with a choice that works, they will gravitate towards it. And when you take the best of rail — the reliability, the speed — and apply it to buses, then commuters will make the obvious choice.

Nowhere is the revolution more in play than in New York City, where the Bx12 Select Bus Service, which high-tails it daily along Fordham Road in the Bronx. Launched two years ago, the line has had major growth and inspired intense loyalty among its passengers. It’s not just the adding of a bus lane, and enforcing it with police patrols that make this bus line so great –there’s also the measures taken to make boarding (the major time-waster on buses) more efficient, like offering a rear door for boarding and allowing passengers to swipe their Metro cards for entry while they’re waiting in line at the bus shelter, rather than paying as they enter the bus.

So how is the actual experience of riding this bus? New York magazine’s Robert Sullivan describes it as follows in a big profile this week on the city’s bus upsurge:

All of the sudden, here it comes: the Bx12. Right away, you see it’s different. A different paint job — new branding, as the transit people like to say — and bright-blue lights flashing on the header. Buying a ticket is different, too: You pay before you board, from a little box like a MetroCard vending machine that offers you a receipt. In the world of transit planning, boarding time is everything, and the receipt streamlines the process. “You just hold on to it,” a woman offers, shouting from under her earbuds. She smiles. “It’s much faster.”

Waiting on the curb, you notice that the bus has its own lane, painted terra-cotta, with signs to deflect non-bus traffic…. You see the big, roomy bus shelter holding enough people to fill a subway car, and you wonder if everyone will be able to get on. But when the Bx12 SBS pulls up, this monster of mundaneness opens up not one but two doors….

Traffic geeks know that about a third of bus delays comes from passenger-boarding issues, and now the doors of the Bx12 SBS open. The stopwatch is running … Twenty-two people board; about four get off. The doors close; the bus sets off. Total wait time: 23 seconds.

Riding on, you see that traffic is heavy. The Bronx River Parkway and the Hutch are jammed. The Bruckner looks like a diseased artery. But the bus cruises down the bus lane, with only one car (a Lexus with Connecticut plates) even thinking of getting in its way.

Still skeptical? You may not be when you hear this: The Bx12 can make the full trip during rush-hour in a total of 12 minutes.

If you think that sounds appealing, you’re not the only one: Weekly ridership on the Bx12 has increased 30% in the last year, and a 2009 study found that 98% of riders said they were satisfied with the service. This satisfaction can only be improved by the installation of GPS systems on buses, so passengers waiting at stops can know when the next bus is coming. (In our opinion, not having this technology on public transit is a form of purgatorial torture.) There’s also the introduction of signal priority, which allows buses approaching an intersection to keep the traffic light green until they pass.

Granted, the holy grail of bus transit — a lane separated by a barrier — is still elusive in the Big Apple. But it may not be for long: (more…)

Flight Delays in U.S. Airports: The Dirty Truth [Graph]

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

flight-delays-graph

CLICK TO ENLARGE

Air travel in the U.S. is pretty abysmal when it comes to on-time flight schedules — this we know (and if you haven’t yet experienced the joy of commercial flight delays, just wait until the summer vacation season deepens). We also know that there’s a light at the end of the tunnel — in a word, NextGen, which promises to make major headway in streamlining flight schedules, and thereby eliminating many of the delays that plague major airports.

Of course, implementing NextGen in all U.S. airports will require a level of funding that causes many to balk. The quesion is, what’s the alternative if we don’t pay for it? Well, here’s our answer. And it’s not pretty.

Graph by Martha Kang McGill

Chuck Schumer Comes Out For the (Much Needed) Public Transportation Preservation Act

Friday, June 11th, 2010

In both the literal and figurative sense, cars aren’t getting us where we need to be. Fickle gas prices, and an even more fickle economy, are leaving many Americans struggling to pay for their automobiles. And then there’s the whole matter of the environmental dead end of oil dependence that’s lurking in the background (and swimming in the Gulf).

The longterm answer to this problem is still up for debate — it may involve alternative fuel services, or a movement into cities, or any combination of technologies and cultural shifts. But right now, in 2010, the answer for many people is public transportation. Americans took nearly 10.7 billion trips on public transit in 2008 — a 4% increase over 2007 and the highest level since 1956. Public transportation use has increased 38% since 1995, an increase that’s nearly triple the growth rate of the U.S. population.

And yet at the same time, it’s getting hammered. In urban centers all over the country, public transportation systems are being forced to lay off workers, cut services, and increase fares. For a complete map of service cuts around the country, click here.

Luckily, policymakers are stepping in to do something about it. Today, New York Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer gave a press conference to garner support for the Public Transportation Preservation Act of 2010. Schumer, who is co-sponsoring the bill along with seven other senators, is urging the quick passage of the act, which would create a $2 billion emergency fund to save public transit jobs, routes, current fares, and more. The money would be available to states through September 30, 2011.

The bill is already gaining praise, with the American Public Transportation Association coming out in strong favor of it and local blogs urging support. Whether or not you’re a consumer of public transportation, it’s hard to argue that this wouldn’t be money well spent.

D.C.’s New Streetcar: Commercial Property Owners Will Foot Part of the Bill

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

modern-streetcarRemember that whole idea of real estate developers paying for mass transit because it inherently increases the value of their property? Well, a miniature version of it  is happening as we speak. The Washington Post reported that around a quarter of the cost of Washington D.C.’s new streetcar plan — which would run along 37 miles of the city and cost $1.5 billion — will be borne by commercial property owners along the H Street-to-Benning Road Northeast line.

The line, which would require six streetcars and would be the first in the system to be built, would receive an additional $60 to $70 million in public funds to get it completed. A lot is hinging on its performance — money for the remaining 37 miles won’t be requested until/unless that first line is a success.

This won’t be the first time in recent history that D.C. mass transit has been funded by private landowners: They paid about 1/4 of the pricetag for the New York Avenue Metrorail station. And there’s good evidence to suggest that the initial investment is worth property owners’ while: A study by the Brookings Institution, Robert Charles Lesser & Co., and the advocacy group Reconnecting America found that the streetcar would increase the value of the revenue-producing commercial properties along the H Street route by $1.1 billion over 20 years.

The idea certainly makes sense from a policy standpoint — those who stand to profit substantially in the future should chip in for (or maybe even foot entirely) the initial costs. But given the human propensity for preferring an immediate, and lesser benefit over a delayed, and greater one, it may be hard to get landowners (or commercial developers) behind the idea on a wider scale.

Still, we can hope. So how is the announcement sitting among the D.C. landowners along the route? According to the Post:

Although fewer than half of the more than 40 commercial property owners invited to the presentation arrived, some developers say they see the value despite the expected costs.

Let’s hope they keep sight of that increased future value when the more immediate bill arrives.

What Does ‘Livability’ Mean to the U.S. Government?

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

livable-communityRecently, the U.S. DOT released its Strategic Plan for 2010 through 2015 to the public. The Executive Summary describes the plan as the following:

President Barack Obama supports a transformative U.S. transportation policy that improves public health and safety, fosters livable communities, ensures that transportation assets are maintained in a state of good repair, supports the Nation’s long-term economic competiveness, and works to achieve environmental sustainability.

Which is an excellent sentiment, and certainly a good goal. But there’s one blaring question: What exactly does “livable communities” mean?

Always ready to shed light on vague transportation language, Secretary Ray LaHood came forward to clarify the term as follows: “Livability,” he said, “means being able to take your kids to school, go to work, see a doctor, drop by the grocery or post office, go out to dinner and a movie, and play with your kids in a park, all without having to get in your car.”

So what we’re talking about here is car-less (or “extreme car-light”) living in dense urban neighborhoods. Which, given the gradual movement towards urban environments, isn’t a pipe dream. But it does present a pretty drastic change to millions of Americans who have come to associate “freedom” and a high quality of life with suburban communities, cul-de-sacs, and above all, cars. As for how the administration plans to achieve this urban-based vision of “livability,” the Plan states the DOT will:

• Establish an office within the Office of the Secretary to promote coordination of livability and sustainability in Federal infrastructure policy;
• Give communities the tools and technical assistance they need so that they can develop the capacity to assess their transportation systems, plan for needed improvements, and integrate transportation and other community needs;
• Work through the Partnership for Sustainable Communities to develop broad, universal performance measures that can be used to track livability across the Nation as well as performance measures that capture local circumstances; and
• Advocate for more robust State and local planning efforts, create incentives for investments that demonstrate the greatest enhancement of community livability based on performance measures, and focus transportation spending in a way that supports and capitalizes on other infrastructure investment, both public and private.

All of which seems like a fancy way of saying, “We need more public transportation, but we’re not entirely sure how to build it.”

The sentiment is certainly valuable, but the government’s major failing is that it presumes a power it doesn’t have. As Ken Orski put it in his Innovation Newsbrief: (more…)

Will Real Estate Developers Build Our Mass Transit?

Monday, May 17th, 2010

streetcar2Over at the Atlantic, they’re running a series called “The Future of the City.” It includes some lighthearted testimonials on U.S. metropolitan staples like ChicagoPortland, and Minneapolis, but there are also worthwhile features on topics like the urban neighborhoods’ partial immunity from the Great Recession.

In his piece “Here Comes the Neighborhood,” real estate developer Christopher Leinberger (who also wrote the lauded 2008 piece “The Next Slums?“) brings up a point that’s infrequently mentioned, but definitely important in the discussion of the long slow death of suburbs and the urban renaissance: “Two-thirds of all households today consist of singles, childless couples, or empty-nesters, and that proportion will rise over the next 20 years. All of these groups tend to prefer walkable urban housing.” He also offers an interesting solution to the “who will fund much-needed public transit?” debate that’s plaguing growing urban areas:

This problem has a solution, one that could be borrowed from U.S. history, and that might help our economy get up more quickly off its knees: What if developers and property owners build the transportation infrastructure themselves?

In the early 20th century, every town of more than 5,000 people was served by streetcars, even though real household income was one-third what it is today. By 1920, metropolitan Los Angeles had the longest street-railway network in the world. Atlanta’s rail system was accessible to nearly all residents. Until 1950, our grandparents and great-grandparents did not need a car to get around, since they could rely upon various forms of rail transit. A hundred years ago, the average household spent only 5 percent of its income on transportation.

How did the country afford that extensive rail system? Real-estate developers, sometimes aided by electric utilities, not only built the systems but paid rent to the cities for the rights-of-way.

Looking back at history, it’s somewhat remarkable how drastically attitudes about private funding of public transit have shifted. According to Leinberger: (more…)

The Five Things Standing Between Houston and Effective Mass Transit

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

houston-metrorailThis guest post is by Kristie Lewis, who writes on the topics of construction management degrees. She welcomes your comments at Kristie.Lewis81@gmail.com.

Houston is the fourth most populous metropolitan area in the U.S., and its population numbers have been steadily rising as the Texan urban economy fares better than its counterparts during the recession. Given its size, one might think that the city would have a public transportation system that would rival any in the nation. But the sad reality is that Houston’s public transportation is, in a word, abysmal. As a longtime Houston denizen and a daily user of its MetroRAIL service, I have identified the following five problems that form the crux of Houston’s mass transit crisis.

1. Attitude
Before any problem actually manifests itself, it has seeds in ideas. A major, almost ideological obstacle to improving Houston’s public transportation is the enduring notion in this town (and the country at large) that one absolutely needs a car to be anybody, or to do anything. Is it true? Partially. And a lot of its truth stems from the layout of the city itself, as Houston is the only urban area in America with no formal zoning laws. However, George Washington University law student Michael Lewyn interestingly contests this notion, explaining that Houston’s auto-dependence can be blamed on other factors as well. I believe that auto dependence in Houston has only become a self-fulfilling prophecy because of preconceived notions held about the city.

2. Politics
Since its founding, the MetroRAIL service has endured a steady barrage of political trials and tribulations. First there were financial accusations against the PAC that supported its construction. Then fingers were pointed at the Houston Chronicle for its supposedly biased media coverage, after an internal memorandum leaked suggesting the paper had political intentions behind rallying support for the rail. Now that the construction of several new lines is in the works, the most recent political scandal involves MetroRAIL itself being accused of shredding documents that would disqualify the new lines from receiving federal funding.

3. Budgeting
Closely associated with the political issues that surround Houston’s light rail system is its budgeting. In fact, budgeting is what nearly the entire political argument is about in the first place. The Houston’s Clear Thinkers blog gives a rundown of the most recent financial disasters, while the Chronicle has reported that Mayor Annise Parker chastised the Metro agency for its fiscal irresponsibility and for breaching the public’s trust.

4. Law Enforcement
One thing I’ve noticed as a frequent rail rider is the inefficiency in the law enforcement system. Unlike many subways and rail systems across the country, the Houston MetroRAIL is patronized by an honor system: You purchase your ticket from the kiosk at the stop, you board the rail, and then you show your ticket or pass whenever an officer happens to be checking. (more…)

The $775 Million for Bus Repair: The DOT Responds

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

Yesterday we wrote about the DOT’s plan to give $775 million in federal funds to the nation’s transit providers to upgrade their bus systems. DOT Press Secretary Olivia Alair has written the following response:

I wanted to clarify a few things about the $775 million that FTA has announced will be given to aid transit districts around the country.

The $775 million announced yesterday is from FTA’s Bus & Bus Facilities program, and by law it must be used for buses and bus facilities, not operations. But FTA’s $4.7 billion annual Urbanized Area Formula program and other programs can be used for operations in areas under 200,000 population. I believe that the Transportation Equity Network has lobbied for a change in the Urbanized Area Formula program so that larger transit districts can use the funds for operations –- but they’ve mixed up the programs. In your post, they are criticizing the Bus & Bus Facilities program — which is all about state of good repair — while advocating for a change in the Urbanized Area Formula program.

Also, I want to note that the DOT is already working to give transit agencies more flexibility in the economic downturn.

The President signed a modification to the Recovery Act last June allowing transit agencies in areas with populations over 200,000 to use 10% of Recovery Act funds for operations. The intent of that modification was specifically to address the immediate operating crisis while not making the long-term recapitalization crisis any worse.

The Secretary also addressed this issue on his blog, and is committed to working with Congress on allowing for more flexibility:

America’s transit agencies are hurting. That’s the simple fact. Significant service cuts and thousands of layoffs have been proposed.

And, although addressing these issues will always be a primarily local and state responsibility, the federal government should try to help.

Accordingly, I will work with members of the House and Senate this year to see if we can allow transit agencies more flexibility to use a portion of their federal funds to cover operating costs during these tough economic times.

Now, this cannot be a blank check. There must be limits.

And clearly, we’re talking about temporary assistance, not the normal course of business.

But for right now, we should do what we can to keep our trains and buses operating, to keep people working, and to keep people getting to the jobs they need so badly.

We need to support this industry so it can help families meet their daily needs all across the country.

Government to Spend $775 Million to Upgrade Nonexistent Buses

Tuesday, May 4th, 2010

abandoned-busRay LaHood has announced that the government is handing over $775 million in federal funds to the nation’s transit providers to upgrade their bus systems. “The FTA is addressing the challenge of bringing our nation’s transit systems into a state of good repair head-on,” the transportation secretary said. Eligible expenses for the funds include: 1) purchase and repair of buses and vans, 2) modernization of buses, bus facilities and revenue service facilities, 3) bus-related equipment, and 4) components of transit asset management plans. Deadline for applications is June 18, 2010, and the grants are expected to be announced in late summer 2010.

Of course, there’s just one small problem: It’s hard to repair buses that are no longer running due to slashes in mass transit budgets. As Transportation Equity Network Executive Director Laura Barrett noted in a statement,

We’re thrilled that the Obama administration has heard and acted on the message of TEN and its allies: our country is in the middle of a catastrophic transit crisis, with 84% of US transit agencies raising fares, cutting service, or both—at a moment when economically vulnerable Americans need transit options more than ever….

Still, these funds only cover maintenance and improvements to bus systems, not the day-to-day operations that are facing massive cuts. These cuts are robbing the most vulnerable Americans of access to jobs, education, health care, and opportunity. The only way to truly keep America moving is to give transit agencies the freedom to use federal funds for day-to-day operations as well.

Seriously, they aren’t kidding: Public transit is approaching disaster levels, with historically high ridership (partly caused by the economic crisis leading commuters to drive less) combined with the worst funding crisis in decades.  These cuts are so widespread, they affect just about every type of community — rural, suburban, and urban alike — and naturally, the groups most harmed tend to be disproportionately made up of groups who need public transit the most — students, the less affluent, inner city residents, and seniors. For a detailed map of just how many cities are already seeing cuts, click here.

As Barrett points out, all hope is not lost: Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown has introduced a bill that would let officials in urban areas decide how to use federal transit funds, based on what the need really is. Now all the government has to do is pass it.

Court Battle in WA: Do ‘Highway Purposes’ Include Rail Lines?

Tuesday, May 4th, 2010

floating-bridgeOver at the New Republic, David Jackson asks:

If a state gas tax is dedicated to “highway purposes,” can you build light rail on Interstate lanes presumably funded with said tax?

We’ll find out in Washington state, where a prominent developer is suing the state over the question.

The litigants include the Puget Sound regional transportation agency, which wants to build a light rail system on the HOV express lanes of Interstate 90’s floating bridge over Lake Washington. The goal is to create a way for Seattle’s many commuters to get to the Eastside, the suburban home of such job-heavy companies as Microsoft and T-Mobile. Jackson describes the details of the case as follows:

Under an amendment to the Washington State Constitution, state gas taxes can only be used for highways (and the extensive state ferry system).

The developer, Kemper Freeman, argues in his lawsuit that would prohibit the conversion of the I-90 HOV lanes to transit use.

Opponents counter with the fact that no highway capacity is to be eliminated, that federal monies paid for the vast majority of the original project, and that under the agreement to build the lanes they are considered “high capacity” transportation improvements which would include light rail.

The state supreme court will hear the case this fall, and the decision will have ramifications for more than just Washington’s future transportation policy. Basically it’s a question of whether the U.S. will continue in a pattern of highway-specific funding from transportation taxes, or will shift to include mass transit as an equal party in need of cash. There’s really not much legal precedent here for what the definition of “highway” is — rather, the court needs to base its decision on the policy implications of restricting every penny of gas taxes collected to the construction and maintenance etc. of new roads. Will passenger rail, and all of its energy-saving, traffic-reducing, efficiency-enabling goals be prioritized on the state court level? Or will we simply keep on building more roads and hoping everything works out ok?

Glenn Beck Takes on Passenger Rail, and No One Wins

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

Following a long tradition of sane and coherent arguments, Glenn Beck yesterday chose to take on trains. Somehow trains are likened to Nazis, and the free market, and more Nazis. Apparently, in Europe trains were built to carry royalty but are now one of two things: fascist or communist. Hitler used trains to transport Jews to concentration camps! And Stalin used trains to take people to gulags! That, and Nazis. And Democrats. Or something. Watch the clip — we’ll send a free Infrastructurist T-shirt to anyone who can give a more coherent explanation of what he’s talking about.

Over at Mediaite, Glynnis MacNicol made as good an effort as any we’ve seen:

Glenn Beck attempted to tackle the financial crisis today and instead got…derailed with strange (mixed) free market metaphors that revolved around train tracks. Example (except this isn’t a metaphor): Hitler used the trains to send people to Auschwitz, Stalin used the trains to send people to the Gulag, our trains (metaphorically) resulted in the light bulb. Translation: America used its power for good, the worst regimes of the 20th century used their power for bad. Back to the train tracks (metaphorically speaking): the thing that linked the Nazis and Stalin was….the Socialism train track.

We’re glad that trains are getting so much play in the world of far-right media, which has traditionally underplayed the importance of mass transit and stood against U.S. high-speed rail. But we’re not sure metaphors like this are the best way to get trains into the forefront of media commentary.

The Morning Dig: HSR Gets Pushed in the Sunshine State

Friday, March 5th, 2010

• Check out the slides from U.S. PIRG Transportation Advocate John Krieger’s presentation at the High Speed Rail 2010 conference in Orlando yesterday. Other guests include Governor Charlie Crist and representatives from Spain and Japan. (USHSR)

Time has an amazing slideshow of urban destruction (through natural disasters or war) and subsequent rebuilding, including cities from Lisbon to Antigua to San Francisco. (Time)

• Another day, another “American Infrastructure Is Going to Hell” rant. (Atlantic Online)

• American waterworks could benefit from a potential jobs bill. The Sustainable Water Infrastructure Investment Act will use incentives to start water projects and encourage hiring. (MarketWatch)

• Telsa is rolling out a partnership with Tag Heuer in Geneva — though EV-charging infrastructure is still needed to make the cars run like a Swiss watch. (Allcarelectric)

• In often overlooked agricultural news, a thriving organic farm is being recognized for expansion and innovation.  Can such a model be a possible alternative to the industrial farm complex? (Agrinews)

• Members of the Taliban have been uprooted from the tribal region of Bajaur. Journalists can now inspect the war infrastructure that has been left behind. (BBC)

• A Brooklyn meeting about potential (read: inevitable) service cuts in the MTA got out of hand. The meeting turned rowdy, eventually leading to four arrests. (1010wins)

What Does TIGER Look Like? A Graphic Depiction

Friday, February 26th, 2010

tiger1

Over at Fast Company, they’ve posted the above graphic by Rob Vargas. It depicts some of the projects that nabbed pieces of the $777 million (out of a total of $1.5 billion allotted) the government has handed out in TIGER grants, which will fund 22 state-sponsored projects and likely create thousands of jobs.

IBM’s Pulse 2010: The Time Is Now to Stop Infrastructure Waste

Friday, February 26th, 2010


Infrastructurist attended this year’s IBM Pulse 2010 conference, held this week at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas. The emphasis was on the company’s new energy initiatives — specifically, their Smart Building Solution, a combo of IMB’s business analytics and enterprise software and Johnson Controls’s energy technology that allows office and residential buildings to monitor their energy and water use and achieve greater efficiency. Right now, powering, heating, and cooling all our existing buildings generates around 40% of all CO2 emissions — even more than automobiles. And as anyone who’s ever worked in a Manhattan highrise knows, efficiency is not always the goal — ever been the only one left in the office, yet all the lights and AC are still on full blast?

Enter IBM’s new initiative — essentially a menu of metering devices and other services that customers can choose from to monitor energy use and offer suggestions for savings. For example, the facility managers of a huge highrise could opt for a dashboard that helps them proactively deal with problems, like identifying a boiler that’s just starting to run inefficiently but hasn’t failed yet. According to Al Zollar, the general manager of Tivoli software for IBM, Big Blue itself has been using the new system for its 98 million square feet of building space, and saved enough to pay the company’s entire energy bill for a year.

Of course no pro-energy conference in Vegas would be complete without a keynote speech from Al Gore. The self-proclaimed “recovered politician” gave a relaxed and jovial talk, focusing on the importance of efficiency and national security, and steering noticeably clear of global warming.