<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Evening Dig: Perfect Parking Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/12/16/the-evening-dig-perfect-parking-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/12/16/the-evening-dig-perfect-parking-edition/</link>
	<description>America Under Construction</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted King</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/12/16/the-evening-dig-perfect-parking-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-11234</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=6557#comment-11234</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the correction. I myself would use "rants against" instead of "hates on". Any idea of the origins of "hates on" ?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the correction. I myself would use &#8220;rants against&#8221; instead of &#8220;hates on&#8221;. Any idea of the origins of &#8220;hates on&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Lessard-Pilon</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/12/16/the-evening-dig-perfect-parking-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-11226</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Lessard-Pilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=6557#comment-11226</guid>
		<description>Yes Ted, I did mean "high-speed." Thanks for catching it. A correction has been made. "Hates on" was simply meant to be colloquial.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Ted, I did mean &#8220;high-speed.&#8221; Thanks for catching it. A correction has been made. &#8220;Hates on&#8221; was simply meant to be colloquial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted King</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/12/16/the-evening-dig-perfect-parking-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-11225</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=6557#comment-11225</guid>
		<description>Nits :
"editorial hates on" ? (Denver Post link teaser)
"big high-seed and commuter rail" (Florida rail bill)
Perhaps you meant "big high-speed and commuter rail".

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nits :<br />
&#8220;editorial hates on&#8221; ? (Denver Post link teaser)<br />
&#8220;big high-seed and commuter rail&#8221; (Florida rail bill)<br />
Perhaps you meant &#8220;big high-speed and commuter rail&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
