5. Dubai
4. Terror in Transportation
3. China
5. Dubai
4. Terror in Transportation
3. China
• Here’s a misty video of the demolition of Lake Champlain Bridge, which runs between New York and Vermont. The 80-year-old bridge was closed Oct. 16 when engineers deemed it wasn’t safe because of severe erosion to its concrete piers. It is scheduled to be rebuilt by 2011. (Huffpo/AP)
• Good news! Governments and industry leaders worldwide are expected to spend a cumulative $200 billion on smart-grid technologies from 2008 through 2015, according to a report released Monday by a Colorado research firm. (BizJournals)
• All hail the Guangzhou-Wuhan HSR route: China has unveiled what it’s billing as the world’s fastest train, which travels at an average speed of 217 miles an hour. (AFP)
• North Carolina makes its HSR move: Of the $8 billion in stimulus funds available for HSR, they’re asking for $5 billion, and state officials say they’ve nearly finished the environmental study. (Citizen-Times)
• At least the U.S. isn’t the only industrialized nation with water problems: Officials in Hong Kong are concerned that all of South China’s supply of water is threatened by climate change, pollution, and excessive demand. (Green Inc)
• StreetsBlog NY puts out its annual Streetsie awards, including Best Pedestrian Project, Biggest Livable Streets Victory, and Best Bus Project. (StreetsBlog)
• And finally, lest we forget that great achievements can come during the worst economic times, Urban Review STL reminds us that Radio City Music Hall opened this week during the Great Depression. (URSTL)
The aughts have been called “The Decade From Hell,” and certainly there was more than enough bad news to justify the title. But the past decade has not lacked for major infrastructure stories, both in the U.S. and abroad. If it’s true that infrastructure is one of the most telling indicators of how a nation is faring, then there’s plenty to gain from examining the major trends around the world — and to see where the U.S. emerges in the greater scheme.
Here are the top 10 largest infrastructure-related stories of the past decade. While the list does include international projects, the focus is on the U.S. Here is the first half. Look for the Top 5 tomorrow.
10. The Lötschberg Base Tunnel Opens
9. Water Water, Not Everywhere
8. Wind Farms
• What to do with all those big gleaming spaces that once housed (now-closed) car dealerships? Many are being repurposed as restaurants, schools, day care centers, and even yoga studios. (AP)
• Meanwhile, are the complexities of modern car models stumping independent mechanics, and even pushing them to the point of obsolescence? (AP)
• Over in Russia, many analysts believe that the recession has ended (yeah, they say the same thing over here). What’s up for the country in 2010? Infrastructure spending, on areas like electricity and transportation (which the Russians apparently call an “embarrassment industry” — we’ll refrain from judgment). (Moscow Times)
• The California water crisis is about to go from “minor crisis” to “major crisis,” with recent droughts leaving water levels at half of what they need to be to sustain the state’s usage. (60 Minutes)
• U.S. News & World Reports lists “Civil Engineer” as one of the 50 best careers of 2010, with the following plug: “With a vast array of jobs, your duties might entail traffic concerns on residential streets, wetlands management, or huge construction projects like skyscrapers or stadiums. Jobs tend to be stable, since infrastructure isn’t optional…” We heartily agree. (USN)
• And finally, for Maryland residents, here are your top 10 transportation stories of the decade. (Baltimore Sun)
• In Germany, high-speed rail lines have led to the grounding of hundreds of short-haul flights. Just imagine what HSR could do for the Northeast Corridor. (Guardian)
• The trials of flying with Snowball: Should airlines be allowed to charge passengers up to $100 to fly with their felines? (Particularly since the kitties don’t get a seat.) (Gothamist)
• The landscape designers who created New York City’s beautiful new High Line are turning their eye towards downtown Cleveland. (Fast Company)
• A Dutch architect theorizes that all the cities of the future may be built on water. And maybe the airports as well? (NRC)
• Wouldn’t it be great if the debacle in Copenhagen had some ripple-effect consequences? And wouldn’t it be even greater if those consequences were positive? (Grist)
• A new fashion line is focusing entirely on bike-friendly clothing (not that we’re suggesting that fashionable-ness is a prerequisite for bike riding). (BikePortland)
Image courtesy of LolCats
• The Transportation Department has announced that it plans to start routinely fining airlines for long tarmac delays, and will prohibit airlines from keeping passengers on a runway for more than three hours. Oh, and snacks and water must be provided during that time (though whether they’d be free isn’t specified). (WSJ)
• How will New Jersey refill its soon-to-be empty coffers for transportation projects? The answer remains a mystery. (Philly.com)
• Cabs have long been notoriously wheelchair-inaccessible. Enter a new initiative in D.C., where a fleet of 20 Toyota minivans retrofitted for wheelchair use are being unleashed on the city. (USA Today)
• Meanwhile, Virginia has cut $42 million from its transportation budget, most of which was intended for repaving projects — lief from the downturn in highway revenue has to come from somewhere. (WaPo)
• Like infrastructure? Like podcasts? Then check out The Infrastructure Show with Joseph Schofer, Director of Northwestern University’s Infrastructure Technology Institute, who opines with knowledgeable guests about the biggest infra topics of the week. (TIS)
• And finally, is San Francisco the worst-run city in the United States? (SF Weekly)
• Big week in HSR. New numbers from CAHSR say the Bay Area-LA fare will rise from an estimated $55 to about $105, or 83% of an airline ticket. The Authority hopes to get $17 billion in federal dollars, $4 billion in local grants, and $10-12 billion in private funding. (Palo Alto Online)
• Japanese train makers are entering the competition for U.S. business. One manufacturer, JR Central, is taking a “winner-takes-all” approach, offering “everything from train cars to signals to maintenance machinery and even employee instruction.” (AP)
• The UK opened its first domestic high-speed rail this week, with 140 mph trains raising fares by about 20%. An announcement of $32 billion for railway infrastructure promises more to come. (Daily Mail)
• A Pan-Euro railway is closer to a reality with the help of a new link between Germany and Belgium, which will share timetables with UK, Holland, and France. (FT)
• A new line between Brussels and Amsterdam makes the trip in just 1 hour 53 minutes. (Reuters)
• And the bad news: HSA, which operates the Thalys in the Netherlands, is in serious financial trouble, in part because it has to pay enormous fees for exclusive rights to high-speed tracks. (NRC)
• The Western High-Speed Rail Alliance–the latest arrival to the federal funding bidding spree–wants to study various corridors connecting Phoenix, Las Vegas, Salt Lake City and Denver. (Las Vegas Sun)
• Ed Glaeser’s work never seems to go away. This piece pairs it with Randal O’Toole’s, which suggests that the environmental costs of building HSR cancel out its benefits (but only if cars and planes become much more efficient). (Politics Daily)
Pic via Inhabitat
I arrived in Copenhagen last night expecting a different scene, perhaps something more like the tent cities and angry protesters that greeted Bradley Whitford in last year’s strikingly relevant TV mini-series Burn-Up, which revolves around a global warming summit in Calgary.
Instead, I was received by a mellow city two days before the conclusion of the U.N.’s much-hyped climate conference.
At the main train station, there were a few posters here and there, but none of the crowds one might expect during an event of these proportions. Outside, despite a significant snowfall, people seemed to be going about their normal business: The buses were running smoothly and bikers were out en masse. Though packed, local trains continued to run as if nothing was abnormal about this week.
This is the untold story of the Copenhagen summit: This city is built to work, even under pressure.
By most accounts, I probably missed the biggest crowds. A 60,000 or more-person protest took place on Saturday. At the Bella Center, where the meetings are taking place, the most vocal constituency now appears to be an assembled mass of the vegetarian followers of Supreme Master Ching Hai. On Thursday they were passing out vegan sandwiches and their Master’s great oeuvre, The Birds in My Life. No joke.
But there was also continued evidence of the conference and its more mainstream participants — everywhere, their presence could be felt throughout the city.
Copenhagen’s infrastructure is able to handle the load handsomely. The two metro lines opened in 2002 and are fully automated, they have no drivers, and they include platform walls in the underground stations to prevent people from falling onto the tracks. (more…)

Daniel Libeskind’s CityCenter in Las Vegas (Kris Ziel).
• The latest installment in a series on the nation’s water supply says that the laws that govern “safe water” are outdated, and millions are potentially at risk. (NYTimes)
• For anyone looking for MTA redemption: A blogger dismantles some of the myths about New York’s MTA, including the idea that they’re entirely to blame for their budget woes and can “find money” somewhere to close the gap. (On Transport)
• Chicago has installed Bus Trackers in businesses near bus stops so passengers can stay warm (and stimulate the economy) while they wait for their ride. (Tribune)
• Uh-oh. Biking is down in Portland. This is a little tricky for politicians, because the city is about to drop a bunch of cash on improved bicycle infrastructure. (Willamette Week)
• Brazil is building a gigantic dam to make the Madeira river navigable for trade, but the social and environmental consequences are nothing to scoff at. One dam executive says, “There are people in society who want to eat an omelet without breaking the eggs.” (WaPo)
• A “starchitect”–the one and only Daniel Libeskind–says that now’s the time to build the big stuff. “This is not the time for mediocre projects,” he says.
Over at The Independent, Holly Williams has a candid and entertaining interview with legendary architect (but don’t call him a “star-chitect”) Frank Gehry. Despite his advancing age (he’s currently 80) Gehry is still full of opinions about the state of architecture and urban planning. Among the more colorful views he shared was:
Other [criticisms of his work] are a little harder to dismiss – or at least they rile him rather more. Shouldn’t he make some more socially relevant buildings? Aren’t his designs too extravagant? Times are tough, after all. This lights the touchpaper as effectively as the s-word. “We are architects … We serve customers!” he barks. “I can’t just decide myself what’s being built. Someone decides what they want, then I work for them. Look, I went to city planning school at Harvard and I discovered that you never got to change a f-cking thing or do anything. Urban planning is dead in the U.S.”
Putting aside the statement’s context, we felt it was worth it to consider this last comment at face value. Is urban planning in fact dead in the U.S.?
Short answer: No, but it has some serious health problems. When you consider the massive projects in areas like Tysons Corner and the efforts of New York’s Janette Sadik-Khan, it’s clear that innovation in urban planning hasn’t entirely met its demise — though granted, there are certainly problems with our accepted paradigms for city planning, such as the idea that cars should be the locus of urban design. Of course, from a bird’s eye view (or architect’s eye, as the case may be) the micro aspects of change may be more difficult than the macro. Still, while Gehry may have been thwarted on plenty of occasions, we don’t think it’s time to throw in the towel on U.S. urban planning just yet.
• ‘Tis the season for year-end roundups: Paul Goldberger, architecture critic for the The New Yorker, has published his list of the ten most positive architectural events of the year. (New Yorker)
• Progress! The Florida governor has signed signed a bill establishing a detailed framework for the Tri-Rail and the proposed $1.2 billion SunRail line. (Progressive Railroading)
• The New York City MTA has approved a final budget — “grim” is the first descriptive adjective that comes to mind. (NYTimes)
• And apropos of this, the Human Transit blog asks, “Why is New York’s transit always in trouble?” (Human Transit)
• In case you weren’t envious enough of China’s new (and amazing) HSR line from Wuhan to Guangzhou, here’s a chart comparing long-distance HSR routes around the world. One guess where the U.S. falls in the rankings. (TransportPolitic)
• Who will the 2010 game-changers be in architecture and design? (Blueprint Mag)

• British mathematicians have come up with a formula that, in theory, will help motorists parallel park perfectly. This raises the issue of whether people who can’t park cars should be allowed to drive. (Telegraph - pic via, from SOLENT)
• Congress will vote this week on a jobs bill that includes $27.5 billion for highways and $8.4 billion for transit. Amtrak will reap $800 mil., and the Army Corps of Engineers, $11 billion. (Finance & Commerce)
• HSR funding will be allocated in January, says Ray LaHood. Other Transpo projects include: funding a NextGen air traffic control system; figuring out whether to use a per-mile-based tax system for cars instead of a gas tax; and launching a PR campaign against distracted driving. (Popular Mechanics)
• Detroit’s Free Press published today the fourth of an eight-part epic presentation on the near-collapse and unsteady revival of Detroit’s auto industry. (FreeP)
• An editorial hates on the Western HSR Alliance, saying it flubbed its facts in its inaugural presentation and that the proposal is not at all economically viable. (Denver Post)
• Governor Crist signed Florida’s big high-speed and commuter rail package into law today. An investigation continues regarding his Transpo Secretary’s use of “Pancakes” and “French Toast” as possible code words in emails discussing the bill. (Tallahassee)
• 18 years after it was shut down, a rail link between Belgrade and Sarajevo has been reopened. The once-glamorous ride uses some grungy trains, but locals are proud to have it up and running. (SETimes)
Back in March, we warned that stimulus money might be spent on a number of huge, wasteful projects around the country. We spotlighted the Ohio River Bridges project through downtown Louisville as the worst offender — it would require a 24-lane monstrosity towering over downtown.
Those seven big infrastructure programs weren’t alone. There are many other highway plans in the works around the country that are primed to be a potential waste of taxpayer funds and increase car use exactly when we should be encouraging the opposite. Here are some of the worst examples.
Seattle’s Alaskan Way Viaduct Tunnel
Everyone is in agreement about one thing: Something has to be done about the Alaskan Way Viaduct, the elevated highway that runs along Seattle’s downtown waterfront. After being damaged during the 2001 Nisqually earthquake, it has to be replaced — or thousands of commuters could be put in danger if and when another disaster occurs.
For much of the past decade, advocates staked their ground on three opposing sides: Some wanted to simply rebuild the viaduct on site, some wanted to tear it down and replace it with a much smaller surface road, and some suggested building a two-mile tunnel under downtown in its place. In the end, Washington state and the city agreed on the latter choice, and the state is planning a more than $3.5 billion investment in the project. As a compromise to transit advocates, about $400 million will be spent on related public transportation improvements by Seattle and King County.
For much of the past year, it appeared that the tunnel’s construction was assured. A contractor is supposed to be picked for the corridor in March 2010.
After winning the election in November, new Mayor Mike McGinn appeared to have become a reluctant supporter simply because of prior commitments made by the city and state, despite the fact that he is a historic opponent of the project, having argued repeatedly for the less expensive and less auto-oriented surface option. But in the Wall Street Journal this week, McGinn said “Nothing has made me think the tunnel is a good idea.” State officials remain committed to the tunneling.
McGinn’s statements suggest that this megaproject may still be defeated. For the sake of a city with exciting light rail plans and big-city potential, we hope this happens, since the tunnel is too expensive and will only advance the interests of car commuters, rather than encourage them to try transit.
Alaska Highway2Highway Project
Most American cities long ago learned the dangers of urban freeways. Beginning in the 1950s, the urban renewal movement advocated building new highways through city centers in the interest of speeding travel times for car commuters. To do so, government planners tore down neighborhoods, with highly unfortunate consequences: more congestion, fewer people riding transit, and less livable communities.
Oddly enough, Alaskan state highway officials seem to want to repeat that story in Anchorage with the Highway2Highway project.
Disappointed with the fact that the city’s two major freeways — the A1 Glenn Highway running north and the A3 Seward Highway running south — end some 3.5 miles apart, project managers want to build a connection between the two. With construction beginning sometime in the mid-2010s, the road would cost upwards of $600 million dollars based on 2005 estimates.
The proposal has yet to be finalized, but all of the alternatives currently on the table share the same problems: They’ll encourage car use and they’ll require the demolition of hundreds of properties. Local residents, and many of the politicians representing them, are unsurprisingly up in arms.
Highway engineers working for the State of Alaska suggest that local roads will be at capacity by 2035, but that’s the point, after all, since these roads run just blocks from the downtown. A vibrant inner-city community is one crowded with people. Rushing people around on big roadways will reduce downtown Anchorage’s attractiveness.
Ironically, proponents of the project argue that it would “reconnect neighborhoods surrounding the project area.” When was the last time that happened after a big road was built?
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Ray LaHood | ||||
|
||||
• Last night, Ray LaHood went on The Daily Show to discuss infrastructure, the stimulus, high-speed rail, and his own net worth. Worth noting: High-speed rail gets big applause from the audience. (Daily Show)
• Over at the Economix blog, Edward Glaeser opines on what makes cities great, and theorizes that events like the economic crisis may actually save cities from the trap of “too much success.” (NYTimes)
• The Obama administration released a seven-point plan to boost U.S. manufacturing this morning, calling for moves like better training for factory workers, opening overseas markets, and defending patents and copyrights. All good ideas — though the question remains whether the president will have the cash to pay for them. (Freep)
• How can we keep California’s high-speed rail project from becoming the next Seattle monorail? Robert Cruickshank offers an analysis. (CAHSR Blog)
• The Google SketchUp team has added a 3-D rendering of Detroit to Google Earth. Definitely worth a look. (SketchUp Blog)
• Jet fuel from coal? The company responsible says it produces fuel with lower carbon emissions, because waste CO2 will be used to help squeeze oil from the ground. It’ll also insulate airlines from the volatility of oil prices. (GreenInc)
• A report from the Veep says that Obama’s clean-energy initiatives will create more than 700,000 jobs, and that they’re “solidly on track” to meet the goal of creating or saving 3.5 million jobs (less than half the number that have been lost since Dec. 2007). (Bloomberg)
• An international survey finds that about 20% of commuters worldwide have considered quitting their jobs because of their trip to work. China is the worst; how do you think the U.S. ranks? (Economist)
• Chicago’s ambitious plan to revamp passenger rail is threatened by its aging freight rail system, which uses the same tracks; massive upgrades are necessary, but the funding has been slow to trickle in. (Sun-Times)
• Archaeologists have found an extensive network of canals and fields dating to 1200 B.C. in Arizona’s Sonoran Desert, which helps solve an age-old puzzle: How did ancient societies irrigate desert crops? (Archaeology)
• An editor’s 10 favorite homes of the year represent a nice array of American architectural styles. (Builder)
The word is out that distribution of stimulus money for transportation projects has been alarmingly absent for minority- and women-owned businesses. A recent investigation by Chicago Public Radio found that less than 10 percent of stimulus funds awarded by the Illinois Department of Transportation went to organizations owned by minorities and women, despite the fact that the state had set a goal of 22.7 percent. Meanwhile, in Missouri, MoDOT has awarded just 1 percent of stimulus contracts to minority contractors and 8 percent to businesses owned by women, according to the NAACP. And the head of the California Hispanic Chamber of Commerce told New America Media he was “not aware of a single one of our members who’s received a contract related to the stimulus package.”
Protests about this distribution inequality have been gaining urgency, to the point where last week the Obama administration urged governors to work harder to ensure that minority-owned businesses get more of a shot on state transportation projects that receive federal funding.
Now the Transportation Equity Network has released the following data: Of the total funds given from the USDOT to qualified contractors, only 5.9% of it went to women-owned businesses, while 10.3% went to minority-owned businesses. Here’s a more detailed breakdown:
FEDERAL CONTRACTS (USDOT direct to qualified federal contractors only):
• Stimulus funds contracted for street, highway and bridge construction: Total: $163.8M
• Allocated to women-owned businesses: $9.7M (5.9%)
• Allocated to all minority-owned businesses: $16.8M (10.3%, including $4.7M or 2.9% to Hispanic-owned)
• Allocated to Hispanic-owned businesses: $4.7M (2.9%)
• Allocated to Black-owned businesses: 0
One question that this data raises is, “So what percentage of construction businesses in the U.S. are owned by women or minorities?” The answer, unfortunately, is “No one really knows.” Julie Cunningham, director of the Conference of Minority Transportation Officials, tells us that no one has a good number, since there is no national registry of minority-owned or DBE (disadvantaged business enterprise) contractors. Individual states have different categories for their registries, and registration is not required — and of the ones who do register, those contractors working in multiple states may be listed as DBEs in one state but do a majority of their work in another. Nevertheless, the numbers are pointing to a clear trend, and it’s not one that benefits female and minority pockets.
We’ve brought you some of the most hilariously defaced street signs in the country. Here’s one with a somewhat surrealist twist:

.
Got a photo of an amusingly-defaced sign? Send it to melissa@infrastructurist.com.
Previously:
Amusingly Defaced Street Signs Part 1
Amusingly Defaced Street Signs Part 2
Amusingly Defaced Street Signs Part 3
Image via Flickr.
• Among the New York Times Magazine’s ninth annual “Year In Ideas”: Bicycle highways and fake car noise. And yes, we fully support the former (though the latter we’re not sold on). Also on the list: suburban cul-de-sac bans. (NYTM)
• So, uh, about that high-speed rail line along the Northeast Corridor? It may be delayed, because the Federal Railroad Administration has been sluggish on documenting the environmental impact. (America2050)
• The Human Transit blog offers a swift and thorough takedown of the argument that public transit is less environmentally sound than private cars because the average city bus cancels out any efficiency gains when it’s not rush hour. (Human Transit)
• The latest in Copenhagen news: China and the U.S. hit a “strident impasse” over how to monitor and verify the terms of the climate treaty. We’re hoping no furniture, insults, or delegates were thrown. (NYTimes)
• The BBC investigates precisely how cities drive local plants to extinction. (BBC News)
• South Korea’s President wants to remake the country’s four largest rivers, both for environmental reasons and to encourage development. He’s known as the “Bulldozer”; critics say it’s a “political boondoggle.” (NYTimes)
• Denser urban developments have the potential to greatly reduce carbon production, but in order to make them attractive, cities will have to provide people with better public spaces. (CityParksBlog)
• Just because you have public transit doesn’t mean people will use it. In L.A., a huge marketing push for its Metro system has increased ridership (and decreased highway traffic) by making buses and trains seem cool. (TheCityFix)
• The budget crisis facing New York’s MTA and a recent arbitration ruling will force the Agency to shutter its W and Z lines and put an end to free transit for students. The chairman of the Rider’s Council calls it a “complete failure of government.” (NYTimes)
• Another boondoggle! This time, in Seattle: next month, mayor-elect McGinn takes office. He is anti-tunnel; the state is anxious to replace the Alaskan Way Viaduct with a subterranean highway. (WSJ)
• Using stimulus funds for bike trails, says Ray LaHood, isn’t waste — it’s progress. Here’s a response from The Secretary to a statement by Senator Coburn deriding bike/ped projects as failing to benefit “the American people as a whole.” (FastLane)
Image via Zakkalicious / Mikael on Flickr
It seems that U.S. infrastructure has a new friend in Washington. The Center for National Policy, a think tank focused on national and global security, has named Dr. Stephen Flynn as its newest president. Former presidents of the group include Cyrus Vance, Edmund Muskie, and Madeleine Albright, while its list of board members has included former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, former Speaker of the House Thomas Foley, and Leon Panetta.
Flynn, a former senior fellow for counterterrorism and national security at the Council on Foreign Relations, and the author of The Edge of Disaster: Rebuilding a Resilient Nation and America the Vulnerable: How Our Government Is Failing to Protect Us from Terrorism, has announced that his top priority will be “responding to the crisis of America’s deteriorating infrastructure as a national security and economic imperative.” He made the following statement in a press release:
Today, our national security, economic competitiveness, and ecological sustainability hinges on whether we can muster the political will to reverse the reckless neglect of our nation’s infrastructure. The United States needs to harness the energy and ingenuity of individuals, universities, and the private and public sectors to lead the world in developing a hybrid infrastructure for the 21st Century — one that is resilient enough to adapt and respond to emerging risks while at the same time creating real jobs for Americans — and opportunities to export innovations to the global marketplace.
We’ve long been bemoaning the state in which the U.S. has found itself — a once excellent infrastructure system that has, through decades of neglect, found itself in increasing obsolescence and disrepair. Add to this the hundreds of billions spent with little result, and the thorny layers of bureaucracy that prevent swift and comprehensive action, and you’ve got a dire situation that draws no clear solutions and, if left unchecked, could create a serious threat to public safety. What we need is a new paradigm for large-scale infrastructure projects — one that we hope the new administration, as well as newcomers like Flynn, can successfully usher in.