<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Daily Dig: High Speed Rail Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/10/23/the-daily-dig-high-speed-rail-edition-21/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/10/23/the-daily-dig-high-speed-rail-edition-21/</link>
	<description>America Under Construction</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted King</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/10/23/the-daily-dig-high-speed-rail-edition-21/comment-page-1/#comment-9542</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=5445#comment-9542</guid>
		<description>Re : "Tubular Rail"

A similar system is mentioned in "Starman Jones" (Robert A. Heinlein, 1953). He also mentioned a tunnel under S.F.Bay in "Citizen of the Galaxy" (1957). FYI - RAH has conceptual credit for the waldo (remote manipulator) and the waterbed.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re : &#8220;Tubular Rail&#8221;</p>
<p>A similar system is mentioned in &#8220;Starman Jones&#8221; (Robert A. Heinlein, 1953). He also mentioned a tunnel under S.F.Bay in &#8220;Citizen of the Galaxy&#8221; (1957). FYI - RAH has conceptual credit for the waldo (remote manipulator) and the waterbed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/10/23/the-daily-dig-high-speed-rail-edition-21/comment-page-1/#comment-9496</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=5445#comment-9496</guid>
		<description>Nimby Engel..your words..So at what point does the common good of society over rule the self centered type of people like you? YOUR condo is next to the 140 year old railroad..your not THAT old so you knew what you were doing buying that property.Now YOU might be dead in 15 years but the rest of us get to live well into the 21 century..with the projected population increase..unless we neuter males there will be 45-million people..airports are land locked space is needed for future long haul flights. Movement and business will need something just as proposed by CAHSR  This is not SiFi  its used around the world as a quality lifestyle for people  to enjoy . Nov 4 2008..your type lost Prop1A passed

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nimby Engel..your words..So at what point does the common good of society over rule the self centered type of people like you? YOUR condo is next to the 140 year old railroad..your not THAT old so you knew what you were doing buying that property.Now YOU might be dead in 15 years but the rest of us get to live well into the 21 century..with the projected population increase..unless we neuter males there will be 45-million people..airports are land locked space is needed for future long haul flights. Movement and business will need something just as proposed by CAHSR  This is not SiFi  its used around the world as a quality lifestyle for people  to enjoy . Nov 4 2008..your type lost Prop1A passed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deacon</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/10/23/the-daily-dig-high-speed-rail-edition-21/comment-page-1/#comment-9421</link>
		<dc:creator>Deacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 05:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=5445#comment-9421</guid>
		<description>@ Martin Engel:

17 000 miles of HSR track for $ 600 Billion, thats $ 35 million per mile, the same as the Korean HSR Costs. Its also close to the Taiwanese $ 37 Million per km cost, and remember the majority of The Taiwan system runs elevated. A very reasonable estimate. Your $ 2 Trillion number can be used as the final final reviewed cost estimate, you know, should shit get completely out of hand.

The most expensive costs per KM to date, on any HSR system, anywhere in the world, is the $ 74 million per km reached in the UK. The USA is a big place and suggesting that the costs of building a HSR system here runs between $ 50 million and $ 80 million are a bit steep. Seeing as no new system has been built here in the good ol' USA and there's a world full of countries that have said systems, those costs could be greatly reduced.

BTW, France build/t their lines for between $ 4 million - $ 10 million per Km, Spain $ 10 Million per Km, Belgium &amp; Germany $ 15 Million per Km. The PDF below has some figures...

http://www.jrtr.net/jrtr40/pdf/f22_ard.pdf

Your Figures are a bit much, I'd say. Again they're all estimates, In construction you don't know how much it costs until its built. 

The Big Dig was a huge cock up from the start. Good Idea, bad planning, design, implementation, management , god you name it, if it was wrong it had to do with the big dig. It has, for the most part succeeded in its goal.

The $ 2 Billion cost you mention is a 1982 Estimate, thats $ 6 Billion in 2006 money. The eventual 2007 Cost came to $ 14.6 Billion, thats $ 8 Billion in 1982 money.(There is $ 7 Billion in interest of course) 

Considering the Project scope and the problems that were the order of the day, they did a fair job of not sending the costs any higher. The money will be recouped by 2038 no biggie. 

What a project like the Big Dig does is teach lessons that can be put to good use in the future. Whether there will be someone actually taking heed is a different story all together.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Martin Engel:</p>
<p>17 000 miles of HSR track for $ 600 Billion, thats $ 35 million per mile, the same as the Korean HSR Costs. Its also close to the Taiwanese $ 37 Million per km cost, and remember the majority of The Taiwan system runs elevated. A very reasonable estimate. Your $ 2 Trillion number can be used as the final final reviewed cost estimate, you know, should shit get completely out of hand.</p>
<p>The most expensive costs per KM to date, on any HSR system, anywhere in the world, is the $ 74 million per km reached in the UK. The USA is a big place and suggesting that the costs of building a HSR system here runs between $ 50 million and $ 80 million are a bit steep. Seeing as no new system has been built here in the good ol&#8217; USA and there&#8217;s a world full of countries that have said systems, those costs could be greatly reduced.</p>
<p>BTW, France build/t their lines for between $ 4 million - $ 10 million per Km, Spain $ 10 Million per Km, Belgium &amp; Germany $ 15 Million per Km. The PDF below has some figures&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jrtr.net/jrtr40/pdf/f22_ard.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.jrtr.net/jrtr40/pdf/f22_ard.pdf</a></p>
<p>Your Figures are a bit much, I&#8217;d say. Again they&#8217;re all estimates, In construction you don&#8217;t know how much it costs until its built. </p>
<p>The Big Dig was a huge cock up from the start. Good Idea, bad planning, design, implementation, management , god you name it, if it was wrong it had to do with the big dig. It has, for the most part succeeded in its goal.</p>
<p>The $ 2 Billion cost you mention is a 1982 Estimate, thats $ 6 Billion in 2006 money. The eventual 2007 Cost came to $ 14.6 Billion, thats $ 8 Billion in 1982 money.(There is $ 7 Billion in interest of course) </p>
<p>Considering the Project scope and the problems that were the order of the day, they did a fair job of not sending the costs any higher. The money will be recouped by 2038 no biggie. </p>
<p>What a project like the Big Dig does is teach lessons that can be put to good use in the future. Whether there will be someone actually taking heed is a different story all together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/10/23/the-daily-dig-high-speed-rail-edition-21/comment-page-1/#comment-9404</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=5445#comment-9404</guid>
		<description>Philly to Pittsburg for $20B?  Pretty cheap for a coast-to-coast line.

[what I am saying is that it is not 1898, and Pittsburgh has had its h back since 1911]

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philly to Pittsburg for $20B?  Pretty cheap for a coast-to-coast line.</p>
<p>[what I am saying is that it is not 1898, and Pittsburgh has had its h back since 1911]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Engel</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/10/23/the-daily-dig-high-speed-rail-edition-21/comment-page-1/#comment-9402</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Engel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=5445#comment-9402</guid>
		<description>Who said that 17,000 miles of high-speed rail service would cost $600 billion?  Do you believe that?  Calculate a mile of HSR track at between $50 and $80 million, and remember that includes everything, including rolling stock,stations, bridges, tunnels, viaducts,etc. not just the rails.   So how much does that come to for 17,000?  (Answer is in the back of the book.)

Now, if you read the writings of Prof. Bent Flyvbjerg, who has done a great deal of research on rail and other mega-infrastructure projects, you will discover what many of us know already -- cost overruns.  Boston Big Dig? From $2 billion before they started, to $22billion  including interest, when they completed the job.  

California's high-speed train, now budgeted at $45 billion, was only $30 billion a few years ago.  Figure the costs to at least double by the time they have completed the 800 miles, fifteen years from now, $90 billion and more.  

I suggest that the proposed national HSR network will pencil out at to at least $1 and perhaps as much as $2 TRILLION dollars.  If you find that ridiculous, you haven't done your homework.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said that 17,000 miles of high-speed rail service would cost $600 billion?  Do you believe that?  Calculate a mile of HSR track at between $50 and $80 million, and remember that includes everything, including rolling stock,stations, bridges, tunnels, viaducts,etc. not just the rails.   So how much does that come to for 17,000?  (Answer is in the back of the book.)</p>
<p>Now, if you read the writings of Prof. Bent Flyvbjerg, who has done a great deal of research on rail and other mega-infrastructure projects, you will discover what many of us know already &#8212; cost overruns.  Boston Big Dig? From $2 billion before they started, to $22billion  including interest, when they completed the job.  </p>
<p>California&#8217;s high-speed train, now budgeted at $45 billion, was only $30 billion a few years ago.  Figure the costs to at least double by the time they have completed the 800 miles, fifteen years from now, $90 billion and more.  </p>
<p>I suggest that the proposed national HSR network will pencil out at to at least $1 and perhaps as much as $2 TRILLION dollars.  If you find that ridiculous, you haven&#8217;t done your homework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/10/23/the-daily-dig-high-speed-rail-edition-21/comment-page-1/#comment-9386</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=5445#comment-9386</guid>
		<description>Sean, the government didn't give away money to banks, it bought their sketchy loans, or lent them money, both of which are recoverable (and, in some cases, have been recovered at a profit).  It was taking on &lt;i&gt;risk&lt;/i&gt;, not just writing the money off or giving it away.  And $600 billion is a big number however you spin it.  I think the key is to focus on one part at a time.  Once people can see an example line, they can judge for themselves whether they think the high price tag is worth it.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, the government didn&#8217;t give away money to banks, it bought their sketchy loans, or lent them money, both of which are recoverable (and, in some cases, have been recovered at a profit).  It was taking on <i>risk</i>, not just writing the money off or giving it away.  And $600 billion is a big number however you spin it.  I think the key is to focus on one part at a time.  Once people can see an example line, they can judge for themselves whether they think the high price tag is worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Pushooka</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/10/23/the-daily-dig-high-speed-rail-edition-21/comment-page-1/#comment-9363</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Pushooka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=5445#comment-9363</guid>
		<description>These dream machine ideas are just that! 'Dreams'! Maybe in another 100 years something may come along like them, but all they are doing right now is clouding the issue! It has been proved to me beyond doubt, that Maglev Transport does work and is here and now! A successful invention like the Transrapid Maglev system as used in Shanghai can't be dis-invented. We should embrace it as a great development in transport technology. Wheels on rails have served us well, but it's time to move on to better, safer and faster things! You know it makes sense!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These dream machine ideas are just that! &#8216;Dreams&#8217;! Maybe in another 100 years something may come along like them, but all they are doing right now is clouding the issue! It has been proved to me beyond doubt, that Maglev Transport does work and is here and now! A successful invention like the Transrapid Maglev system as used in Shanghai can&#8217;t be dis-invented. We should embrace it as a great development in transport technology. Wheels on rails have served us well, but it&#8217;s time to move on to better, safer and faster things! You know it makes sense!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/10/23/the-daily-dig-high-speed-rail-edition-21/comment-page-1/#comment-9350</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=5445#comment-9350</guid>
		<description>The cost to build the interstate highway network would be about one trillion in today's dollars.

So $600 billion is pretty cheap in comparison. It is less than the amount of money Congress gave away to the banks. It is less than what we have spent in Iraq.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cost to build the interstate highway network would be about one trillion in today&#8217;s dollars.</p>
<p>So $600 billion is pretty cheap in comparison. It is less than the amount of money Congress gave away to the banks. It is less than what we have spent in Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/10/23/the-daily-dig-high-speed-rail-edition-21/comment-page-1/#comment-9345</link>
		<dc:creator>Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=5445#comment-9345</guid>
		<description>$600 billion sounds about right. And it will be European companies saying: "Thank you America. Thank you China. You have a good day."

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$600 billion sounds about right. And it will be European companies saying: &#8220;Thank you America. Thank you China. You have a good day.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
