<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Daily Dig - &#8216;12-Car Garage In NYC&#8217; Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/09/10/the-daily-dig-12-car-garage-in-nyc-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/09/10/the-daily-dig-12-car-garage-in-nyc-edition/</link>
	<description>America Under Construction</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wad</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/09/10/the-daily-dig-12-car-garage-in-nyc-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-7654</link>
		<dc:creator>Wad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=4842#comment-7654</guid>
		<description>Dallas, you are absolutely right. Many of us in L.A. are upset over Metro's decision to spend $100 million (!) on a gating system.

There's also research that has shown that fare barriers are only marginally better than proof of payment, and both systems had very high rates of compliance. The study said that both systems are highly effective, and agencies would be best to stick with what they have as switching costs outweigh any gains or savings.

L.A.'s system has 94% compliance. Our problem isn't that 6% are not paying their fares, it's that our riders are too honest. Fare gates won't push compliance to 100%; no system achieves that. At best, $100 million would only get us 96% compliance.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dallas, you are absolutely right. Many of us in L.A. are upset over Metro&#8217;s decision to spend $100 million (!) on a gating system.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also research that has shown that fare barriers are only marginally better than proof of payment, and both systems had very high rates of compliance. The study said that both systems are highly effective, and agencies would be best to stick with what they have as switching costs outweigh any gains or savings.</p>
<p>L.A.&#8217;s system has 94% compliance. Our problem isn&#8217;t that 6% are not paying their fares, it&#8217;s that our riders are too honest. Fare gates won&#8217;t push compliance to 100%; no system achieves that. At best, $100 million would only get us 96% compliance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/09/10/the-daily-dig-12-car-garage-in-nyc-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-7625</link>
		<dc:creator>Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=4842#comment-7625</guid>
		<description>The LA turnstile thing sounds like a bad idea from a politician. Lots of research has been done on transit ticketing. Research has shown, over and over again, that the gains made by allowing free access far out weigh the losses from ticket sales. In fact, free loaders aren't even that big of problem. Think about it, when ever you see a random sweep on a train, how many people don't have tickets? I live in Dallas, and I've never actually seen a cop write a ticket. The vast, vast majority of people purchase their tickets honestly. I can't imagine this saving LA "million of dollars". In fact, it probably won't even pay for the installation of the turnstiles.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The LA turnstile thing sounds like a bad idea from a politician. Lots of research has been done on transit ticketing. Research has shown, over and over again, that the gains made by allowing free access far out weigh the losses from ticket sales. In fact, free loaders aren&#8217;t even that big of problem. Think about it, when ever you see a random sweep on a train, how many people don&#8217;t have tickets? I live in Dallas, and I&#8217;ve never actually seen a cop write a ticket. The vast, vast majority of people purchase their tickets honestly. I can&#8217;t imagine this saving LA &#8220;million of dollars&#8221;. In fact, it probably won&#8217;t even pay for the installation of the turnstiles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streetsblog New York City &#187; Today&#8217;s Headlines</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/09/10/the-daily-dig-12-car-garage-in-nyc-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-7589</link>
		<dc:creator>Streetsblog New York City &#187; Today&#8217;s Headlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=4842#comment-7589</guid>
		<description>[...] UES Home of Wall Street Genius Includes 12-Car Garage (Biz Insider via Infrastructurist) [...]

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UES Home of Wall Street Genius Includes 12-Car Garage (Biz Insider via Infrastructurist) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric F</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/09/10/the-daily-dig-12-car-garage-in-nyc-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-7536</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=4842#comment-7536</guid>
		<description>They have converted a rail bridge across the Hudson into a park.  $35 million.  Should be a nice amenity for the Poughkeepsie peeps.  Opens next month.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have converted a rail bridge across the Hudson into a park.  $35 million.  Should be a nice amenity for the Poughkeepsie peeps.  Opens next month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
