Archive for July, 2009

The Daily Dig - High Speed Rail Edition

Friday, July 31st, 2009

high speed trains in spain
.

Pic via

Talking Trains With IBM’s Head Of Rail Innovation

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

ibm-rail-center

The media took notice last month when IBM announced it was opening a “Global Rail Innovation Center” in Beijing. It was an intriguing and timely announcement, certainly. And though we couldn’t help but think that it would have been cool to locate it in a place like Detroit, but we also know that China is the new world leader in high speed rail investment and any sane profit-minded company wants to be where the action is. A sense of proportion: China has made a $730 billion commitment to fast passenger rail, compared to $13 billion in the US.

In any case, it struck us an exciting project and were glad to have the chance last week to speak with Keith Dierkx, the director of this new center, and hear his thoughts on where high speed rail in the US is headed–both literally and figuratively. He was nice enough to chat with us from Beijing on his birthday and offer some insights on what goes on at this rail innovation place, what factors will determine whether HSR hits the big time in the US, and how to kickstart a domestic rail equipment industry.keith-dierkx

You argued in Forbes recently that it’s a good thing that the US is only now getting serious about passenger rail. Do you really believe that?
Absolutely. There’s an interesting analogy with Africa in this context. Africa went from no phones to mobile phones very quickly. They were able to leapfrog all that expensive copper infrastructure for landlines. I think we’ve got a similar opportunity to leapfrog intermediate technologies and go straight to 250 mph state of the art trains. It makes competition with the regional airlines all the more compelling.We’re late to the game, but things have advanced so much over the last several years that we have an opportunity come in, cherry pick the best solutions, and go right to the head of the class.

Ed Rendell has talked about how rail should replace air travel under 500 miles in this country. Do you agree?
That’s a very real alternative. I do think the opportunity with rail is more around replacing shorter commuter airline travel than replacing car travel. For example, people who are driving to San Francisco and LA are probably driving for a specific reason. Maybe they want to have a car there. But when they take a plane–by the time you get to the airport two hours ahead of time, go through security, get your bags…–high speed rail competes very well.

How could rail change how Americans live?
As you know, one of the challenges in the US because of “car culture” is that we have spatially organized our society in a very diffuse way with suburbs. And so there’s this sense that we’re not concentrated enough from an urban center to urban center standpoint. I think rail offers a viable way to do that and to become enormously more green as a country.

(more…)

The Daily Dig - ‘Tear Down This Sign’ Edition

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

border600
.

The Daily Dig - ‘Kalashnikovs For Clunkers’ Edition

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009


.

The Best of TreeHugger: Fat Cars, Vegan Robots, and The World’s Coolest Subway Maps

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

treehuggerist-best-of-treehugger

Each week, we’ll be doing a round-up of some of our favorite stories from our friends over at TreeHugger. Likewise, a weekly Infrastructurist digest will be kicking off soon at TH. -Jebediah

This week, TreeHugger wondered to what extent poor public transportation was to blame for America’s obesity epidemic–not as much as evolution is, according to two new books on America’s fatness. But evolution never accounted for soft drinks, the most consumed food by calories in the United States. If the average American drank water instead, he or she would weigh fifteen pounds less.

Given the obesity epidemic, we probably don’t want to start making edible houses–but that’s what some Aussie architects did (on a small scale, anyway). A better idea might be growing your own building. Then again, after learning that the US has enough empty houses now to contain the population of the U.K., maybe we should “digest” that surplus first.

The military’s newest reconnaissance robot, EATR, is eating well: it consumes organic material for energy (fortunately, it’s a vegetarian). If the robot ever learns how to build buildings though, it might want to check out Collin’s slideshow on geodesic domes for growing your own food.

The Air Force is looking leaner, thanks to the “green” budget cuts approved by the Senate this week. But American automobiles remain awfully fat, as gas mileage has remain fairly constant since the 1970s, in spite of better efficiency. The House of Representatives, recognizing that the U.S. only has about 1/100th of the world’s clean natural gas-burning vehicles, is backing a national natural gas fueling infrastructure, to the tune of $150 million.

In NYC, which has fewer cars per capita than any other US city, people only need charge up their MTA fare cards to get around on one of the world’s coolest subways–not to be confused, of course, with the coolest subway maps.

(more…)

In Teetering Dubai, A New Metro And World’s Tallest Building Are About To Debut (Photo Tour)

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

burj_dubai_b

Oh, Dubai. Sometimes we wish you success, because you’re so funny. Other times we can’t wait till you run out of oil and just turn back into a desert wasteland, because you’re so gross.

Of late, the Gulf city-state has been trending somewhere between those two courses. They’ve shut down all kinds of massive half-baked construction projects, but are pushing ahead on a select few. Most notable in the “pushing ahead” category are the world’s tallest building and the city’s new metro system (exempted on the “half-baked” count). The powers that be in Dubai have been planning a grand simultaneous unveiling of the two in September, in fact — seeing it as a perfect opportunity to get massive amounts of media attention and declare to the world, “We’re still actin’ all rich!”

Sadly, there’s a hitch. Construction on the Burj Dubai, the 206-story luxury residential and office tower–space will supposedly go for $3,500/square foot and up–is running behind schedule, and will not be complete by September. So the metro–which features a “Gold class” section for “VIPs”–will debut alone and therefor won’t get anywhere close to as much media attention.

It turns out that Dubaites (?) are pretty upset about it. Nearly half “believe the delay to the Burj Dubai is a missed opportunity to put Dubai back on the global map.” An additional 17 percent are sad because Dubai now looks like the kind of slacker place that can’t keep to a schedule when building white elephant projects.

To celebrate the synergy that might have been though, here are some fact boxes and photos of the $4 billion, 2,600-foot aluminum stalagmite and the $4 billion, 22-mile first phase of the new metro system.

Dubai Metro

Fast facts:
(more…)

The Daily Dig - ‘Throwing SmartCars In Canals’ Edition

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

SmartCar in canal
.

Photo mock-up stolen from Murdoch’s The Sun

What Do Americans Have Against Awesome Toilets?

Monday, July 27th, 2009

toto-toilet-neorest

Here’s a question: why would a consumer culture reject a technology that makes one of our most basic human functions more comfortable and hygienic? After all, Americans are voracious in their appetite for novel products when it comes to everything from drinking water to cleaning the floor. But given the opportunity for a more hygienic and comfortable means of doing our bathroom business, all of a sudden we’re intent on sticking with bathroom technology from the 19th century. Why?

This is the very question that Japan’s largest toilet-maker is trying to answer. The company offers various models that do all kinds of lavish things to and for the user. While they’re ubiquitous in Japanese households–until recently, more common than PCs–”smart” potties have failed to catch on in the US market.

A typical Japanese loo, for instance, would do some or all of these things for the user:

* Cleanse “front and back” with three separate streams of water
* Dry “front and back” with air blowers
* Warm the seat
* Automatically put down the seat (a feature cleverly dubbed the “marriage saver”)
* Illuminate itself with a programmable nightlight
* Monitor medical conditions by preforming urine tests
* De-ionize the air to remove odors
* Play a soothing waterfall or birdsong soundtrack “to drown out embarrassing noises.”

(more…)

Cruise Liner Unwittingly Drags Giant Dead Whale Into Port

Monday, July 27th, 2009

A gruesome scene played out in Vancouver over the weekend as a 950-foot cruise ship pulled into the city’s Canada Place port with 70-foot fin whale impaled on its bow. The animal’s enormous carcass required two tug boats to pull it free of the boat, before divers could recover it for testing. Fin whales are the second largest animals on earth and are classified as a threatened species.

It’s not clear where the Sapphire Princess, which was coming south from Alaska, hit the whale, but speculation centered on the sea lanes north of Vancouver Island. The coastal waters between southern Alaska and Seattle are both rich in marine life and heavily-trafficked by cruise vessels and oil tankers. In 1999, a Celebrity cruise liner killed a fin whale in the same area._46114697_can_alaska_ship_226map

The broader subject of whales’ grim situation in the today’s oceans is in the air anyway, as it was explored in depth a couple of weeks ago in a fine magazine article by Charles Seibert. Besides the dangers ship hulls and human garbage, naval sonar tests seem to be so painful to the animals that they apparently try to dive very deep to escape the racket and wind up getting the bends (something scientists had previously not thought possible for whales). In this case, it’s not unreasonable to think that noise from the ship’s engines and propeller might have played some role in disorienting the creature.

By the way, the lead in line on that video–the ship coming into port “with an extra passenger”–how tone deaf is that?

Map: BBC

The Daily Dig - New York Bridges Edition

Monday, July 27th, 2009

The Daily Dig - High Speed Rail Edition

Friday, July 24th, 2009

Anaheim rail station
.

(more…)

What’s Your Water Footprint?

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

water-calculator

Mine is 1,117 gallons per day, as calculated by the H20 Calculator. Frankly, that’s much bigger than I would have thought, even if slightly below the US average of 1190. But my living arrangements are hardly typical:

* I live in an apartment and have no lawn of any sort

* I don’t own a car (so no washing)

* My shower is “low flow

* My dishwashing habits are a bit erratic — which must add up to some water savings

Sure, I leave the water running while brushing my teeth and I don’t “let it mellow” as the website so artfully suggests–but still, 1,117 gallons a day? That’s enough to fill a small pool a couple times a week. Where does it all come from?

The overwhelming majority of this water use–one discovers upon reading the personalized analysis–is a result of eating meat and dairy products (as I do). That alone works out to more than 500 gallons, or half the total. Eating plant products uses another 500 gallon, but that’s not exactly discretionary…

Does PETA sponsor the calculator or something? No–it’s a pretty impressive coalition that includes The Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future. There doesn’t seem to be an institutional bias against carnivorism.

That said, the site’s takeaway–intentional or not–can be neatly summarized as: Meat and dairy production are so water intensive that that choice dwarfs any other basic lifestyle choices or attempts to conserve. Including “letting it mellow.”

20/20 Vision: In The Future Will Oil Cost $20/Barrel–or $20/Gallon?

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

rusty_oil_drumsThere is an interesting resonance in a couple of predictions about energy prices that have hit the press recently. A widely-noted new book announces that gasoline will get so expensive–$20 a gallon–that it will completely upend how the world economy operates and how each of us lives. Meanwhile, a respected energy expert is saying that we face a “devastating” overhang of oil supplies and, in the event of a mild winter, could see oil fall to $20/barrel prices. If past experience is any guide, that would push gas down to around a $1/gallon in many places.

It’s a remarkable situation. And strange as it may sound, the predictions could both be right: oil could plunge in the next few months and then skyrocket in the next few years. But one is liable to get whiplash trying to plot a course that accounts for both outcomes.

There’s a lot hanging in the balance, obviously. We’re having these epochal policy discussions on environmental and economic issues. Yet through it all there’s the disconcerting sense that our future course will overwhelmingly be determined by energy prices.

Climate? Oil above $200 would be like cap-and-trade on steroids. It would bring about sudden and violent reforms in how our communities operate and how we get around. Our carbon footprints would shrink dramatically. Conversely if crude were to remain under $50 for the next decade or so, it’s tough to imagine making much progress weening ourselves from its energetic charms–not to mention the billion or two strivers in Asia who are already aching to crank the key on a Tata Nano.

Transportation and cities? If gasoline gets very expensive, transportation options will proliferate. Ride sharing and van pools will become cold necessity for tens of millions of Americans who now drive their own cars. Cities and suburbs will be forced to act fast to figure out ways to make life less energy intensive–the manner of the changes will be a good deal more improvisational than our current ways of doing things.

What’s disconcerting is that we’re prisoners to the price of oil. And the price of oil is a black box–in five years, will it be $20 0r $200? Who knows!

Where we could reclaim some agency would be to accept, as a society, that gas *might* be going to $10 or $20 a gallon. T. Boone Pickens and the many others who share this view could very easily be right–and anyone who claims or implies certainty to the contrary, is being paid to say that (e.g. Daniel Yergin) or is a moron (e.g. Jerome Corsi). Accepting this notion means that we are required by all principles of prudence and responsibility to treat it as a likelihood.  The downside of gambling on the point could be catastrophic — so let’s just go ahead and start building a multi-decade national plan that assumes double digit gas prices. Policy makers should just make that case: “We don’t know! But we have to assume…”

From there, a lot of other now-pressing issues would start to resolve themselves, we’d guess.

NOTE: We’re starting a regular book review here at The Infrastructurist. Next week, we’ll be reviewing Christopher Steiner’s $20 Per Gallon: How The Inevitable Rise in the Price of Gasoline Will Change Our Lives for the Better. We’d like the reviews to be interactive — so if you’re inclined, give it a read, and weigh in next week.

The Daily Dig - ‘Know Your Fire Hydrants’ Edition

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

hydrants
.

(more…)

Let’s Replace Central Park With An Airport! Ha?

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

manhattan-airport

Some secret group called the Manhattan Airport Foundation thinks it’s time to do away with the world’s most famous park and put a state of the art aviation facility in middle of Manhattan. Now is certainly the time for bold ideas–but is this one a little too bold? Let’s at least give the MAF a respectful hearing:

Does New York City really need an airport?

New York City is the financial and cultural capital of the United States. It is also our most densely populated urban area. The Foundation believes these characteristics make an airport a vital transportation necessity for individuals living and working in Manhattan, as well as visitors to the area.

(more…)

The Daily Dig - ‘Plants Are Infrastructure Too’ Edition

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

chicago-city-hall .

Pic

Steven Chu Is Totally On Facebook

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

Steven Chu on Facebook
Secretaries of Energy are just like us! They’re on Facebook too, compiling their hobbies and likes and dislikes and throwing up a few old photos, including the one where they’re next to a celeb.
Rapping with Brad
By “they,” we mean Steven Chu. Who we admire. But today we know more about him than we ever expected to–or perhaps even wanted to.
.
For instance:
* He likes biking and doing crosswords with his wife Jean and is “trying to learn golf.”
* He used to wear those big low-on-the-cheeks double-bridged glasses that hipsters wear now–and wore them pretty well actually.
* He shows good high-low range in his choice of quotes, from an inspiring but highly speciesist one from William Faulkner about how human beings are the best things ever to a Yogi Berra classic about taking the fork in the road.
*”My career has not gone exactly as planned.” (Wow, us too!)
* He planned to be a theoretical physicist but got sidetracked into experimental physics. He won a Nobel Prize anyway. (Never mind.)
* He graduated from HS when he was 18, so didn’t exactly follow the Doogie Howser-style accelerated academic plan.
* Jean is brilliant too, holding a PhD from Oxford–presumably the one founded in the Middle Ages, not “Oxford” the Internet diploma mill. Talking to the boss
* His musical tastes are “Classical, some opera”–thankfully not a Dave Matthews fan or something.
* He took a meeting with Brad Pitt and is still a little bit aglow over it.
* He looks nervous when he’s talking to his boss.

(more…)

Between Cell Phones And Higher Speed Limits, 25,000 Deaths And $1 Trillion Lost On US Roads?

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

speed-limit-80

Big, shocking numbers attached to diffuse phenomena are weird — one reads them and kind of goes, “Hmm, that’s a lot!” But there are no collapsing skyscapers to look at on tv, and after a moment of trying to figure how to react, one tends to go back to one’s Wii Bowling or whatever.

Consider that, in the past 14 years, speed limits higher than 55 mph and our strange tolerance of the dangers of cell phone use while driving together may have cost the country more than 25,000 lives and more than a trillion dollars. Even by the large-livin’ standards of this country, that’s quite a toll from two perfectly preventable causes. But… yeah.

The reason we’re hitching these two phenomena together is that have both been in the news this week–alarming stories about the unexpected and preventable toll of each–and that they also seem to be similar in some fundamental respect. (More on that latter thought presently.)

This morning, the NY Times ran a front page story about how in 2003 some miserable stooges at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration iburied plans for a long-term study of the safety implications of driving while using cell phones and also deep sixed a fact sheet that already made a pretty strong case it was unsafe. They did this for bureaucratic reasons–afraid that they’d run afoul of Congress and might endanger their funding.

(more…)

The Daily Dig - ‘259-Car Pile Up’ Edition

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

crash500

.

  • Officials at the Dept of Transportation were well aware that when drivers use a cell phone (of any sort) they are as dangerous as drunks. But they buried the facts to avoid “antagonizing” Congress and to preserve billions in agency funding. (NYT)
  • From the dept. of “Wow!”: Obesity falls 10% for ever $1 increase in the price of gasoline. Then again, considering even a dime in new gas tax is judged to be “politically impossible” these days, maybe we’ll just stay fat. (Forbes)
  • The Senate passes a $27 billion bill to bail out the Highway Trust Fund, which is set to run out of money later this summer. The measure includes $5 billion for transit program. What will the House do? Unclear, sayeth the 8 ball. (Streetsblog DC)
  • China is planning to implement a national smart grid by 2020. And since the government owns 100% of the transmission capacity, it can just give the say so. Plus, this factoid: “China has a lot of electricity meters.” (Forbes)
  • One of the planks Atlanta mayor Shirley Franklin ran on four years ago was fixing the city’s wretched sewer system. Now, leaving office, she’s declared victory. It cost billions, but at least she got to take a field trip down into the sewer. (Fox)
  • Internet data centers are weirdly opaque facilities. Companies like Google won’t even reveal how many they have. We do know, however, that Apple is spending $1 billion to build a big one in the tiny N.C. town of Maiden. (Hickory Record)
  • The “dismal and ubiquitous” sidewalk sheds that announce construction projects are like NYC’s own downmarket version of street arcades. It’s nice that they save us from falling hammers — but why do they stay up for a decade or more? (WSJ)
  • Think your commute was bad? Yesterday there was a 259 car pile-up on Germany’s A2 autobahn between Berlin and Hanover. A small army of emergency responders descended to attend to the dozens of injured motorists. Video after the jump. (ITN)

(more…)

What Would Our Headlines Look Like If Rail Travel Were Only As Safe As Car Travel?

Monday, July 20th, 2009

A real train wreckThere’s an old knock–frequently cited at the expense of Thomas Friedman–about the kind of journalist who quotes his cab driver.

That said: I was in Washington, DC, a few days after the recent Metro accident and my cabbie was complaining about the traffic. He explained that it had suddenly gotten much worse since the accident. All his passengers were afraid to take the train, he said. One after another, they’d sworn they were done forever with the Metro. Business was so good, in fract, he was planning to do several extra hours of work that evening.

It’s anecdotal, of course–but also believable. Something awful and scary happens and people get, well, scared. Naturally, a raft of alarmist rail safety stories followed. The San Francisco crash over the weekend brought this conversation back to mind though–no doubt there are more than a few nervous Muni riders this week and some reporters looking for a “Is Your Commute Safe?” angle.

Of course, intellectually most people know that rail travel is much safer than driving. But do they know how much safer? For instance, what would the headlines look like if rail were only on par with the safety of automobile travel?

In that case, we’d be seeing an accident on the scale of one in DC–9 deaths–about every 10 days. Or, alternatively, one on the scale of the Metrolink crash last year in southern California, which killed 25 people, every month. (This is based on rough calculations of about 5 trillion passenger miles logged in cars–with 38,000 deaths–and about 40 billion miles on our various rail networks, where similar fatality rates would yield about 300 deaths a year.)

But, in fact, such accidents are tremendously rare. The Metrolink was the worst in 15 years. And even though the last year has been been rotten where passenger rail accidents are concerned–and questions do need to be asked–fewer than 40 people have died. That’s fewer than die on the roads in an average morning in this country.