<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gallery: Cell Phone Towers Pretending To Be Trees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/</link>
	<description>America Under Construction</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jackisalive</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-10841</link>
		<dc:creator>jackisalive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-10841</guid>
		<description>these towers arent really for cell phones there to listen in (big brother) and also for mind control!!do you research

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these towers arent really for cell phones there to listen in (big brother) and also for mind control!!do you research</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-10506</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-10506</guid>
		<description>The tree towers are at least more attractive that some options.  I am a municipal planner and have been dealing with a NIMBY furor over a massive 100 foot flag pole which is a not-so-stealthy "stealth" tower.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tree towers are at least more attractive that some options.  I am a municipal planner and have been dealing with a NIMBY furor over a massive 100 foot flag pole which is a not-so-stealthy &#8220;stealth&#8221; tower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daina Krumins</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-10255</link>
		<dc:creator>Daina Krumins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-10255</guid>
		<description>Here's a cell phone tower.  Do you believe it really exists?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a cell phone tower.  Do you believe it really exists?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Post Napa &#8220;Free&#8221;-dom &#124; Bitches on a Budget</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-9935</link>
		<dc:creator>Post Napa &#8220;Free&#8221;-dom &#124; Bitches on a Budget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-9935</guid>
		<description>[...] of a ride.  Midway up we crossed over and headed through the Redwood Forest. (You know all those ridiculous cell towers dressed up like insanely tall pine trees but that really resemble cheesy plastic bottle brushes? Imagine a whole forest of them, but bigger [...]

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of a ride.  Midway up we crossed over and headed through the Redwood Forest. (You know all those ridiculous cell towers dressed up like insanely tall pine trees but that really resemble cheesy plastic bottle brushes? Imagine a whole forest of them, but bigger [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a kesling</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-8545</link>
		<dc:creator>a kesling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-8545</guid>
		<description>I take offense to people who are suggesting that the view out of my house is a small price to pay so that cell phone users can pay less for their airtime. Especially since I do NOT own a cell phone, nor use one. I value the "view" or vista from my yard and take exception to those who think their cellphone is more important. I don't interrupt your phone calls. Don't think you should be able to interrupt my pleasure of NOT seeing a cellphone tower in any disguise outside my house.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take offense to people who are suggesting that the view out of my house is a small price to pay so that cell phone users can pay less for their airtime. Especially since I do NOT own a cell phone, nor use one. I value the &#8220;view&#8221; or vista from my yard and take exception to those who think their cellphone is more important. I don&#8217;t interrupt your phone calls. Don&#8217;t think you should be able to interrupt my pleasure of NOT seeing a cellphone tower in any disguise outside my house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calli Arcale</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-8129</link>
		<dc:creator>Calli Arcale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-8129</guid>
		<description>AICP_Planner: more and more communities are demanding that power lines be "stealth" as well -- by burying them underground.  Underground lines do have some distinct advantages, particularly during storms, but they also have major disadvantages: they're much more expensive to install and maintain.  They don't need as much maintenance, because they're not exposed to the elements, but they're also not accessible.  And then the various utilities have to put some kind of an access box at the junctions so they don't have to bring in a backhoe every time they need to work on them, and *that* box is often a source of grief (and creative landscaping) in people's yards.  You can always tell whose got the electrical junction box on their property, because of the huge and otherwise inexplicable collection of low-maintenance shrubs plunked in an odd part of the yard, usually trimmed back in one area by order of the utility.  (And yes, they can order you to trim it.  Penalty for ignoring them is that *they* trim it, and probably not with an eye to aesthetics.)

The city of Bloomington, MN is heavily averse to new cell phone towers, requiring they be placed on existing structures.  As most of the city is residential (with laws forbidding building taller than your neighbors without special dispensation), this presents significant challenges for cell phone providers.  Almost every high-rise is festooned with antennas, and still there are substantial coverage gaps.  One provider decided to fix this by making an arrangement with a local church: the cell phone company would foot the bill for them to install a new bell tower, which would belong to the church and which the cell company would rent, providing them with a much-needed source of reliable revenue.  It went in, it looks great -- but the city council called shenanigans, because this was clearly installed to be a cell tower, not a bell tower.  The giveaways are the fact that the bells are purely cosmetic and it is a freestanding structure next to the church rather than physically attached.  After much grumbling, it was proven to them that this did not actually violate the code, as written, and that furthermore, the city council had approved the building permit.  (They just hadn't paid attention to the details.)  The city reluctantly allowed it,but promptly changed the law to make it even more restrictive.

Thus, due to NIMBYs, Bloomington will never have any of these fake tree towers.  They are against city code, because no matter how well disguised, the fact is that they are primarily intended as cell towers.

Stupid.

Google maps has a picture of the bell/cell tower under construction.  The part at the top has been covered with a brown metal with the church's stylized cross logo.  It actually fits in pretty well, really.  I've linked it under my name.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AICP_Planner: more and more communities are demanding that power lines be &#8220;stealth&#8221; as well &#8212; by burying them underground.  Underground lines do have some distinct advantages, particularly during storms, but they also have major disadvantages: they&#8217;re much more expensive to install and maintain.  They don&#8217;t need as much maintenance, because they&#8217;re not exposed to the elements, but they&#8217;re also not accessible.  And then the various utilities have to put some kind of an access box at the junctions so they don&#8217;t have to bring in a backhoe every time they need to work on them, and *that* box is often a source of grief (and creative landscaping) in people&#8217;s yards.  You can always tell whose got the electrical junction box on their property, because of the huge and otherwise inexplicable collection of low-maintenance shrubs plunked in an odd part of the yard, usually trimmed back in one area by order of the utility.  (And yes, they can order you to trim it.  Penalty for ignoring them is that *they* trim it, and probably not with an eye to aesthetics.)</p>
<p>The city of Bloomington, MN is heavily averse to new cell phone towers, requiring they be placed on existing structures.  As most of the city is residential (with laws forbidding building taller than your neighbors without special dispensation), this presents significant challenges for cell phone providers.  Almost every high-rise is festooned with antennas, and still there are substantial coverage gaps.  One provider decided to fix this by making an arrangement with a local church: the cell phone company would foot the bill for them to install a new bell tower, which would belong to the church and which the cell company would rent, providing them with a much-needed source of reliable revenue.  It went in, it looks great &#8212; but the city council called shenanigans, because this was clearly installed to be a cell tower, not a bell tower.  The giveaways are the fact that the bells are purely cosmetic and it is a freestanding structure next to the church rather than physically attached.  After much grumbling, it was proven to them that this did not actually violate the code, as written, and that furthermore, the city council had approved the building permit.  (They just hadn&#8217;t paid attention to the details.)  The city reluctantly allowed it,but promptly changed the law to make it even more restrictive.</p>
<p>Thus, due to NIMBYs, Bloomington will never have any of these fake tree towers.  They are against city code, because no matter how well disguised, the fact is that they are primarily intended as cell towers.</p>
<p>Stupid.</p>
<p>Google maps has a picture of the bell/cell tower under construction.  The part at the top has been covered with a brown metal with the church&#8217;s stylized cross logo.  It actually fits in pretty well, really.  I&#8217;ve linked it under my name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Banks</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-8041</link>
		<dc:creator>William Banks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-8041</guid>
		<description>I think they look really good. I would not having one in the back of my house.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they look really good. I would not having one in the back of my house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AICP_Planner</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-5734</link>
		<dc:creator>AICP_Planner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-5734</guid>
		<description>Tower guy is right.  Another part of the problem is that communiteis REQUIRE wireless companies to design them this way.  This puts a lot of added cost to the design and construction of the tower.  This us ultmately passed on to you and me.  So we get to pay for perseving the 'view'.  

Tony- if they designed them all like the one in A2, can you imagine how much our cell bills would go up?  

People think these are just thrown up there for giggles.  There is a scientific approach to placing them in the areas where coverage and capacity is needed.  People want coverage in their house (an area the phones aren't really designed to get a signal). Communities treat them like trailer parks.  

Double edged sword- everyone wants coverage and nobody want to see the infrastructure that provides it.  Last time I checked, I pass about 1,000 telephone poles, high tension wires, and street lights everyday.  Why aren't those 'stealth'?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tower guy is right.  Another part of the problem is that communiteis REQUIRE wireless companies to design them this way.  This puts a lot of added cost to the design and construction of the tower.  This us ultmately passed on to you and me.  So we get to pay for perseving the &#8216;view&#8217;.  </p>
<p>Tony- if they designed them all like the one in A2, can you imagine how much our cell bills would go up?  </p>
<p>People think these are just thrown up there for giggles.  There is a scientific approach to placing them in the areas where coverage and capacity is needed.  People want coverage in their house (an area the phones aren&#8217;t really designed to get a signal). Communities treat them like trailer parks.  </p>
<p>Double edged sword- everyone wants coverage and nobody want to see the infrastructure that provides it.  Last time I checked, I pass about 1,000 telephone poles, high tension wires, and street lights everyday.  Why aren&#8217;t those &#8217;stealth&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ha! Amusingly Defaced Street Signs, Part 3 &#187; INFRASTRUCTURIST</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-5284</link>
		<dc:creator>Ha! Amusingly Defaced Street Signs, Part 3 &#187; INFRASTRUCTURIST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-5284</guid>
		<description>[...] check out our HILARIOUS photo gallery of cell phone towers badly disguised as [...]

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] check out our HILARIOUS photo gallery of cell phone towers badly disguised as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-4402</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-4402</guid>
		<description>We've got one here in El Paso, TX. Its supposed to be a palm tree but it looks very awkward on the edge of the city, right in the middle of the dessert! Its a good landmark if I get lost though.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve got one here in El Paso, TX. Its supposed to be a palm tree but it looks very awkward on the edge of the city, right in the middle of the dessert! Its a good landmark if I get lost though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-3197</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-3197</guid>
		<description>I used to work for T-Mobile.  We actually had birds nesting in some of our fake trees!!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to work for T-Mobile.  We actually had birds nesting in some of our fake trees!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-3178</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-3178</guid>
		<description>Another way to disguise cell towers in semi-rural areas is to erect an old-style farm windmill tower with a platform near the top for the antennas.  We have one here in a Southern California suberb that has the windmill unit on top; not sure if it's connected to a generator or just spins for visual effect.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another way to disguise cell towers in semi-rural areas is to erect an old-style farm windmill tower with a platform near the top for the antennas.  We have one here in a Southern California suberb that has the windmill unit on top; not sure if it&#8217;s connected to a generator or just spins for visual effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-2851</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-2851</guid>
		<description>http://farm1.static.flickr.com/164/397066289_7a3206b77e.jpg?v=0

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/164/397066289_7a3206b77e.jpg?v=0" rel="nofollow">http://farm1.static.flickr.com/164/397066289_7a3206b77e.jpg?v=0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-2850</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-2850</guid>
		<description>They're giant sticks. You could easily design a nice one. Case in point-- the cell tower at Domino's Farm in Ann Arbor, MI designed by Gunnar Birkerts. 



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re giant sticks. You could easily design a nice one. Case in point&#8211; the cell tower at Domino&#8217;s Farm in Ann Arbor, MI designed by Gunnar Birkerts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-2762</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-2762</guid>
		<description>Cell Phone Industry People -- What companies should I follow up with that have long-term projects across the nation.  We do crew lodgin well nationally. Thanks for any insignt into your industry!!  -- J.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cell Phone Industry People &#8212; What companies should I follow up with that have long-term projects across the nation.  We do crew lodgin well nationally. Thanks for any insignt into your industry!!  &#8212; J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Worldtravel &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Peripheral Milit_Urb 29</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-2570</link>
		<dc:creator>Worldtravel &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Peripheral Milit_Urb 29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 11:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-2570</guid>
		<description>[...] in the Bag? 3-D Scanners for Airports // LIVE from the inside of a carry-on xray machine // Cell Phone Towers Pretending To Be Trees // Lights! Camera! Action! // Invisibility cloak edges [...]

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the Bag? 3-D Scanners for Airports // LIVE from the inside of a carry-on xray machine // Cell Phone Towers Pretending To Be Trees // Lights! Camera! Action! // Invisibility cloak edges [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbarella</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-2358</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbarella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 08:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-2358</guid>
		<description>Oh, come on!  Some of those really aren´t that bad.  But okay, *some* of them *are* ;)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, come on!  Some of those really aren´t that bad.  But okay, *some* of them *are* <img src='http://www.infrastructurist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daina Krumins</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-2296</link>
		<dc:creator>Daina Krumins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-2296</guid>
		<description>Here are some more cell phone towers in New Jersey.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some more cell phone towers in New Jersey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-1982</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 23:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-1982</guid>
		<description>There is one near my house that's really funny.  I live in the Sierra Nevada mountains and the cell tower installed near downtown Truckee, CA is designed to look like a blue spruce.  The problem is there are no blue spruce in the area.  So this slightly bluish "tree" stands out like a sore thumb from all of the green pine trees.  It's easy to spot anywhere within a couple miles.

Funny stuff,
Garrett

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one near my house that&#8217;s really funny.  I live in the Sierra Nevada mountains and the cell tower installed near downtown Truckee, CA is designed to look like a blue spruce.  The problem is there are no blue spruce in the area.  So this slightly bluish &#8220;tree&#8221; stands out like a sore thumb from all of the green pine trees.  It&#8217;s easy to spot anywhere within a couple miles.</p>
<p>Funny stuff,<br />
Garrett</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s A &#8216;Spooey&#8217;? A Field Guide To Freeway Interchanges, Part 1 &#187; INFRASTRUCTURIST</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-1930</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s A &#8216;Spooey&#8217;? A Field Guide To Freeway Interchanges, Part 1 &#187; INFRASTRUCTURIST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-1930</guid>
		<description>[...] CELL PHONE TOWERS PRETENDING TO BE TREES [...]

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CELL PHONE TOWERS PRETENDING TO BE TREES [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TowerGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-1901</link>
		<dc:creator>TowerGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-1901</guid>
		<description>Note: I obviously meant "most people *wouldn't* willingly" in the first paragraph

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note: I obviously meant &#8220;most people *wouldn&#8217;t* willingly&#8221; in the first paragraph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TowerGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-1900</link>
		<dc:creator>TowerGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-1900</guid>
		<description>I work in the cell tower industry.

The reason these exist is that the "real" cellphone towers are suffering from severe NIMBY.   The existing ones got placed in undeveloped areas, along highways, etc, etc.  (b/c most people would willingly put something 200+ feet tall next to their home - although it actually would pay your mortgage, easily).

Two thing have happened: 1) cellphone use and coverage has increased, requiring more antennas and more towers in more places. 2) The population finally noticed these towers, especially as the population expanded and built new homes in the places that used to be empty (this happens especially in the west and south).  They scream bloody murder if you try to put up a new one (which make the existing ones *very* valuable).

So you get a lot of these "stealth" towers.  They also show up on (new) high school stadium lights (if the antennas aren't obvious, look for an extra 5-10 feet cylinder above the lights), inside (new) church bell towers/steeples, just above billboards (usually out of the sightline), or inside the flashing on a new stripmall or the like.

Existing structures are also being used creatively. In cities, they are on the corners of buildings or on the rooftops - again, usually just behind the siteline.  Watertanks and (newly) electric company infrastructure are being used.

Yeah, the trees look pretty stupid if you stop and look at them, but they are intended to work like Kristine said - keep them from standing out like a sore thumb.  You have to jump through hoops to please the local town committees.  

Although, as I found out once I started working in the business, once you know what you are looking for, they are *everywhere*.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work in the cell tower industry.</p>
<p>The reason these exist is that the &#8220;real&#8221; cellphone towers are suffering from severe NIMBY.   The existing ones got placed in undeveloped areas, along highways, etc, etc.  (b/c most people would willingly put something 200+ feet tall next to their home - although it actually would pay your mortgage, easily).</p>
<p>Two thing have happened: 1) cellphone use and coverage has increased, requiring more antennas and more towers in more places. 2) The population finally noticed these towers, especially as the population expanded and built new homes in the places that used to be empty (this happens especially in the west and south).  They scream bloody murder if you try to put up a new one (which make the existing ones *very* valuable).</p>
<p>So you get a lot of these &#8220;stealth&#8221; towers.  They also show up on (new) high school stadium lights (if the antennas aren&#8217;t obvious, look for an extra 5-10 feet cylinder above the lights), inside (new) church bell towers/steeples, just above billboards (usually out of the sightline), or inside the flashing on a new stripmall or the like.</p>
<p>Existing structures are also being used creatively. In cities, they are on the corners of buildings or on the rooftops - again, usually just behind the siteline.  Watertanks and (newly) electric company infrastructure are being used.</p>
<p>Yeah, the trees look pretty stupid if you stop and look at them, but they are intended to work like Kristine said - keep them from standing out like a sore thumb.  You have to jump through hoops to please the local town committees.  </p>
<p>Although, as I found out once I started working in the business, once you know what you are looking for, they are *everywhere*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 17:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-1892</guid>
		<description>kristine...it isn't even about them looking ridiculous and ugly (though they do)...it is simply that they should be designed and celebrated.  Bell towers were functional man-made structures shooting into the sky...and they were made beautiful.  So beautiful in fact that we now copy them and make fake bell towers.  Same goes for chimneys.  

Cell phone towers should be designed to look like cell phone towers...or a beautiful version thereof.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kristine&#8230;it isn&#8217;t even about them looking ridiculous and ugly (though they do)&#8230;it is simply that they should be designed and celebrated.  Bell towers were functional man-made structures shooting into the sky&#8230;and they were made beautiful.  So beautiful in fact that we now copy them and make fake bell towers.  Same goes for chimneys.  </p>
<p>Cell phone towers should be designed to look like cell phone towers&#8230;or a beautiful version thereof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-1877</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-1877</guid>
		<description>I like the redwood tree growing randomly in the subdivision

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the redwood tree growing randomly in the subdivision</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kristine</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>kristine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>I actually think with a couple of exceptions, the fake trees look better than huge towers. Most of these are liekly near highways and people are traveling at 70 miles per hour. They only see a tree. They look stupid in a picture, but just fine traveling. Oh...I don't work for a cell company.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think with a couple of exceptions, the fake trees look better than huge towers. Most of these are liekly near highways and people are traveling at 70 miles per hour. They only see a tree. They look stupid in a picture, but just fine traveling. Oh&#8230;I don&#8217;t work for a cell company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marco</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-1315</link>
		<dc:creator>marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-1315</guid>
		<description>It reminds me of the (fake) christmas trees of my childhood!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It reminds me of the (fake) christmas trees of my childhood!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ha! Amusingly Defaced Street Signs, Part 2 &#187; INFRASTRUCTURIST</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-1164</link>
		<dc:creator>Ha! Amusingly Defaced Street Signs, Part 2 &#187; INFRASTRUCTURIST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-1164</guid>
		<description>[...] CLICK HERE TO SEE OUR *HILARIOUS* PICS OF CELL PHONE TOWERS BADLY DISGUISED AS TREES.  [...]

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CLICK HERE TO SEE OUR *HILARIOUS* PICS OF CELL PHONE TOWERS BADLY DISGUISED AS TREES.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Higashide</title>
		<link>http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/04/03/gallery-cell-phone-towers-pretending-to-be-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Higashide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infrastructurist.com/?p=1755#comment-901</guid>
		<description>Honestly, some of those evergreen ones blend in all right.  What is that last one... a cactus???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, some of those evergreen ones blend in all right.  What is that last one&#8230; a cactus???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
