Archive for February, 2009

Dirty, Dirty Clean Coal

Friday, February 27th, 2009

The fraternal duo that gave us Barton Fink and Fargo is now lending a hand to the effort to debunk “clean coal” technology. In this spot by Joel and Ethan Coen, a lovely family gets fooled by a slick-talking salesman into freshening the air in their idyllic home by spraying it with black coal dust. Take that, “clean” hucksters!

Apart from being vaguely amusing, it’s also generally accurate. Which is to say, coal should be actively shunned as part of our national energy strategy. As the world’s leading climate expert put it recently, coal-fired power plants are “death factories.”

Unfortunately, Obama is still on board with clean coal. Why? Coal’s a huge part of the energy pie and has so many interest groups behind it, that it would take a huge act of political courage to say what needs to be said on the subject. For a while there was even a $2 billion trial project in his home state that might have inclined him to believe the hype, although that seems to have been dropped.

The real answer is two-fold. First, to build out our renewable capacity, particularly wind and solar. And second, to become more like France by replacing coal with nuclear. As a nation, we seem to be engaged with the first challenge, but totally ignorant of the second. It would be interesting to see a major Hollywood director take on the latter, politically trickier issue.

February’s Headlines

Friday, February 27th, 2009

Feb 27:
The 2010 budget is out. Highlights include:

  • $1 billion-a-year high speed rail grant program to the states;
  • $1.3 billion in USDA loans and grants for rural broadband from the USDA;
  • A proposed carbon cap and trade program that could raise $80 billion by 2012;
  • the administration “will emphasize the use of economic analysis and performance measurement in transporation planning.”

Other news:

  • New York City mayor Mike Bloomberg and city planner Janette Sadik Khan unveiled a plan to turn midtown sections of Broadway into pedestrian plazas. (Streetsblog)
  • Manufacturing in Indiana has been hard-hit in recent years — but the clean energy sector is thriving. (EDF)
  • A $25 billion loan program for electric car technology isn’t rolling yet. (NYT)
  • US Capitol to switch from coal power to natural gas? (AFP)
  • Palo Alto residents want the high speed LA-to-SF trains to be “invisible” — a rail technology that even Japan and Europe don’t have. (San Jose Mercury News)

(more…)

Schwarzenegger: “We Have to Come Up With a Sexier Word Than ‘Infrastructure’” (Can You?)

Thursday, February 26th, 2009

schwarzenegger03The Governator was the star panelist in a discussion last weekend in the National Governors Conference about the infrastructure crisis. It was generally a smart and useful chat. (We’ve got more to say about it, in fact — stay tuned). But this moment really jumped out at us:

SCHWARZENEGGER: [Gov. Rendell, Mayor Bloomberg and I] happen to be very passionate, all three of us, very passionate about infrastructure. [...]

We in California have made a big move forward in that area because the people of California have approved $42 billion of infrastructure.[...]. I think that was a really big, big step forward and I think that the federal government has to do obviously the same thing.

The important thing is that we look at how do we get the people enthusiastic about the subject? Because the word infrastructure means nothing to the majority of people of America. We have to come up with a sexier word than infrastructure. So the key thing is that you have to go out and promote and market this the right way like with everything in policy.

[In California] we went out and didnʹt talk about infrastructure but we talked about are you angry about getting stuck in traffic every day, and you cannot spend enough time with your family and with your children? That really aroused anger in most of the people and we said vote yes on those propositions.

So we got them really focused on those things you know and talked about that the levees that we have in California are 100 years old and if thereʹs an earthquake or if thereʹs a big storm it would be disastrous and hundreds of thousands will get wiped out and it actually will make Katrina look small compared to what would happen in California.

That woke them up.

This actually seems like a rather serious point (and one that public works guru Felix Rohatyn made yesterday). It’s not a good word. It’s long and twice in rapid succession entails three ugly consonant sounds all jammed together. So let’s throw it open: Can you come up with a snappy word for “infrastructure”? Post any suggestions (serious or not) in the comments section. Over coming weeks we’ll revisit the question and hopefully field some legitimate options.

The World’s Most Extreme Escalators

Thursday, February 26th, 2009

With all the talk about whether our trains will ever rival Europe’s or Asia’s, here are some notable examples of another elegant but understated mode of human transport. For your viewing pleasure, some people-mover porn:

1. Shortest escalator: Okadaya Mores shopping mall in Kawasaki, Japan. Certified by the Guinness Book of Records with a vertical height of only 33 inches.

(more…)

Big Box of Trouble: Dealing with the Coming Plague of Empty Superstores

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009
<em>The Spam Museum in Austin, Minnesota, is a renovated Kmart</em>

The Spam Museum in Austin, Minnesota, is a renovated Kmart

When Circuit City announced last month that it was going out of business, everyone’s concern was naturally with the 34,000 employees that got laid off. Less noted has been the fate of the chain’s 1,500 big box stores scattered across the U.S. and Canada. The company, whose locations average about 25,000 square feet, was an anchor tenant in many malls and shopping centers. With numerous other big retailers teetering, not only are the prospects for filling Circuit City’s spaces gloomy, there will likely be a rash of follow-on closings among neighboring stores. And many analysts think the national retail shakeout is still in its early stages.

The problem of retail vacancies on this scale is so new that it hasn’t really been studied yet. Perhaps the only authority on the subject of empty big box stores is Oberlin College professor and artist Julia Christensen. She has spent the last seven years traveling around the country seeking out and documenting cases of communities reclaiming abandoned big boxes and putting them to a socially productive use–for instance, as museums, libraries, rec centers, and schools. She wrote about it all in her recently published book Big Box Reuse (MIT Press). A few days ago, we got her thoughts on how towns and cities can make beneficial use of these vacant structures and turn a hole in the local fabric into a community asset.

Studying big box reuse is such a timely and fascinating project. How did you get started?
I began the project because I grew up in a small historic town in central Kentucky called Bardstown. It’s very well preserved with over 300 buildings in the national registry of historic places–and meanwhile Wal-Mart has expanded twice there involving three sites in town. The company’s original store, abandoned so they could build a larger structure on the other side of town, remained vacant for about ten years. Eventually the town needed a new courthouse building and they decided to build on that lot. Doing so really changed the civic structure of the town. It was very intriguing.

(more…)

Felix Rohatyn: Don’t Treat Infrastructure Spending as an “Expense”

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

felix-rohatyn1Felix Rohatyn, the financier who helped save New York City from going broke in the 1970s and the author of a new book about public spending, did a turn on CNBC this morning to discuss Obama’s stimulus program.

The $800 billion bill, he said, “was necessary” but he “would have preferred a bigger percentage going to infrastructure.” In fact, he was a bit surprised at the result: “I was under the impression infrastructure would have [a] broader” role in the bill. “Then, lo and behold, it disappeared” after congressional committees began rewriting things.

A truly key point: “We treat infrastructure from an accounting point of view as if it was an expense” instead of an investment.

Maybe we should call it something else?, he mused. “Infrastructure” doesn’t quite roll off the tongue. It’s “an awful word.” But, as a matter of substance, spending on infrastructure is one of the best things we can do: “it is such a creator of employment, wealth [...] and productivity. [...] I get tired of hearing that the government can only do bad things.” If you look back through history, “the results of government investment are spectacular.”

(We’ll post the video if/when it become available.)

Why the Vehicle-Miles Traveled Tax Is Getting Short Changed

Tuesday, February 24th, 2009

traffic-jamDeron Lovaas is the National Transportation Policy Director at the Natural Resources Defense Council. Robert Puentes is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institute, where he focuses on issues related to metropolitan growth and development.

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood’s suggestion last week that the nation consider adopting fees based on mileage driven (sometimes referred to as vehicle miles traveled, or VMT, fees) was brushed aside too quickly. While substantive issues remain, there is no reason to throw the baby out with the bath water.

This worthy idea is part of the long term future of transportation finance in this country. It would use satellite tracking devices to record how far and when motorists drive and would assess a fee based on those travel habits. Benefits include better allocation of revenues (based on the roads used), better allocation of costs (vehicles damaging to infrastructure such as heavy trucks could be assessed at a greater fee), and better allocation of resources (higher fees could be charged based on time of day and congestion levels).

(more…)

The Subway Series

Monday, February 23rd, 2009

good-transparency-taking-the-train_1235350745858Do more people ride the subway in NYC or Mexico City? Which has a more expensive fare, Seoul or Moscow?

Go look at this beautiful chart comparing usage, system length, and fares for rail transit systems around the world. It’s another from our friends over at Good magazine who have one of the best-looking publications you’ll ever see.

It’ll keep you entertained for a while.

Things Get Snippy Over the Vehicle Miles Tax

Monday, February 23rd, 2009

lahood-obama

Transportation policy nerds everywhere watched with interest last Friday as Ray LaHood got kneecapped by Obama’s press secretary for raising the possibility of a national vehicle miles traveled, or VMT, tax. It would be levied by putting GPS locators in cars and then taxing drivers based on distance driven. It’s seen as necessary by advocates to address a gap (predicted to get worse) between gas tax revenue and the actual costs of maintaining our highway system.

Obama seems to have no interest in fighting this particular battle. “It’s not on table,” said Robert Gibbs, after LaHood’s remark was published in an AP story.

Secretaries of transportation, and transportation policy makers in general, do seem to be fond of the idea though. Federico Pena, who served under Clinton, endorsed the VMT approach in a conversation with us late last month. Perhaps not coincidentally, he also said that he and LaHood were planning to chat so LaHood could pick his brain.

LaHood is hardly out on his own. Later this week the “blue ribbon” National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission  will issue a report backing the VMT tax (or that’s what we’re hearing anyway). Several states, including Oregon and North Carolina, are pursuing the option or look like they will.

What’s mystifying though is why anyone would be a serious fan of the VMT tax. For the reasons Matt Yglesias lays out in this post, it just seems a mediocre option. A subcompact hybrid on an empty road and Chevy Avalanche driving on a highway pay the same rate? Huh?

(more…)

Outsmarted by the Smart Grid?

Monday, February 23rd, 2009

ge_scarecrow_still_500_crop

America has had more than its share of delusions about energy. The latest concerns the “smart grid” – that this bright new technological miracle will help us overcome reality.

Al Gore, Thomas Friedman, Amory Lovins and Silicon Valley are the predictable originators of this story, but corporate America has quickly jumped into the game. General Electric is now running an ad that suggests how “the smart grid” will help us transcend the difficult – but reality-based – choice of whether to power our country with coal or nuclear.

Here’s how the ad goes. A flaxen-haired girl of about ten is standing in front of a clothes dryer, “It says to wait until 10 p.m.,” she declares. Then she is in front of a wall outlet: “It only takes what it needs.” Then she is standing in front of a distribution box: “It talks to the others.” Finally she is in front of a window: “It brings power from far away.”

(more…)

New Amtrak President Declares War on Dead End Bureaucrats

Friday, February 20th, 2009

train-wreckOn CNBC yesterday Jim Cramer went on a rant about why bank nationalization is a bad idea. Executive summary: “The government can’t run anything!” Example A: “Look at Amtrak!”

Poor Amtrak. So many haters. If new president Joseph Boardman is to be believed though, the much-abused national rail company isn’t going to take this “hapless bureaucracy” rap sitting down (nodding off, in fact) anymore.

But before he changes any minds, Boardman wants you know that all that stuff is true. In a revealing new story from Trains Newswire, Boardman describes Amtrak as being “in worse shape than he thought” and full of hopeless clock-watchers. But he’s promising that change is on the way. Some key points from the piece:

>> Boardman sees a lot of burned out bureaucrats at Amtrak. He refers to them as “people who don’t believe.”

>> He’s planning to go on a firing spree. “Boardman says [any] Amtrak managers… who cannot make the transition from a survival mode to a growth mode will have to find another job.”

>> The previous management, despite the fact that traffic was up 12 percent last year, didn’t order any regular passenger cars as part of their five year plan. For some reason they just asked for odds and ends like “baggage dormitory cars.”

>> That five-year plan was, for some reason, “secret.”

(more…)

Cyclist-Hating Cop To Explore Professional Options

Friday, February 20th, 2009

The thoroughly hateable Patrick Pogan has been canned by the NYPD. Remember Patrick? He’s the cop who decided to express himself with a random act of violence against a cyclist taking part in a peaceful demonstration for safer and more bicycle-friendly streets. And he got caught on video doing so. If you aren’t familiar with the incident, or you just want to intensify your schadenfreude at hearing the news, give YouTube some traffic:

Amtrak Ads Through the Years

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

If you are of a certain age, you’ll remember some of these.

There’s one with the amazingly catchy show tune-style chorus of “All aboard! All aboard! All aboard Amtrak!” And one, clearly from the mid-70s, with a lounge singer crooning about the virtues of train travel (the latter also features an intimate moment of a mustachioed groom carries his bride over the threshold of the sleeper cabin.) In both there are mentions of strange artifacts like “Yellow Pages” and “travel agents.”

But these ads also underscore that for more than 30 years, Amtrak has been a static entity. Adjusting for hair styles and production fads, the spots from the Ford administration could still be running today. The only substantive development that your average passenger could point to in the last three decades would be the introduction of high-speed Acela service in late 2000 (a year behind schedule).

The $8 billion in rail funding that Obama demanded be in the stimulus package probably marks the beginning of a new age of rail in this country. (With all due modesty we’ll note that the Infrastructurist broke the story that it was Obama who demanded the $8 billion for high speed rail funding — four days before this Politico piece re-broke it.) Which probably means Amtrak should get a new ad agency.

Magazine Claims Women Don’t Have “The Driving Gene”

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

click-here-for-full-itemFrom the Department of Uncomfortable Reads comes this effort by Middle Eastern laddie magazine UMen to enumerate the top ten reasons why “Women Can’t Drive.” The conceit would be tricky to pull off even in a part of the world where women have the universal right to do so, but the Jordan-based Maxim imitator–by all appearances honestly trying to be provocative and funny without being antisocial–doesn’t let that hold them back. For instance, the list begins with this Wilde-esque observation:

10. Their Dogs Occupy the Front Seat - For some reason, women like to have their dogs in the car. And that’s ok, to some extent. But when it starts to become a distraction, then that’s the issue. [...] One bimbo riding on the lap of another bimbo equals one big reason women can’t drive.

It continues on to point out that the ladies don’t know the difference between a car and an iPod (”they don’t realize… pressing shuffle doesn’t automatically park the car”) and lack “the driving gene.”

It’s probably unnecessary, but we feel compelled to point out that women are actually safer drivers — in the US they die or suffer serious injury behind the wheel at less than half the rate of men (12,747 highway fatalities for femails compared to 29,722 for males in 2006, the most recent year for which data are available). On somewhat shakier ground there’s also this BBC story declaring “hormones make women safer drivers.”

The timing is kind of unfortunate, too — what with recent events reminding us of how dark the implications of Middle Eastern chauvinism can be.

Click on the image below (after the jump) for a pop-up, full-sized version of the UMen item.
(more…)

America’s First Infrastructure Stimulus Project: A Bridge to Nowhere?

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

osage-bridge
Missouri was really eager to get bragging rights on this whole “shovel-ready” thing. The governor and various other officials, including state transportation director Pete Rahn, staked out a rural bridge yesterday while Obama prepared to sign the stimulus bill. As soon as the presidential nib came up from the page, the $8.5 million project to replace the Route 17 bridge over the Osage River near Tuscumbia was officially underway. The state tendered a check for slightly over $200,000 to the contractor on the project and a backhoe immediately started digging a hole for a pylon.

According to Rahn, the firm was about to lay off a employees and the stimulus allowed them to hire instead. “There were a lot of happy construction workers,” he said later. He expects the project will create a total of 250 jobs.

Of course, it’s also worth noting that the bridge is not exactly a crucial artery – it serves a town of about 200 people and, according to local paper, is “so remote that Missouri transportation officials brought a special satellite truck to allow highway commissioners to meet and award the bridge construction contract.” We don’t know exactly what that means, but it does sound pretty remote.

Obama Talks Infrastructure On Air Force One

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

obamaaf1

Obama gave a wide-ranging on-the-record interview last week with five political columnists, including E.J. Dionne from the Washington Post. (The full transcript is now available.) His remarks about bank nationalization have gotten most of the ink so far, but also he made some very salient and smart remarks about infrastructure spending. We’ve pulled them out of the larger transcript and highlighted statements that seem to be of particular note. In short: he wanted to make the smart grid a bigger item than it was; it sounds like he wants to make some major (and much needed) changes in the next transportation bill; and he still wants an infrastructure bank–an idea he floated during the campaign.

On why there wasn’t as much infrastructure as he might have liked: “[With] infrastructure, you get probably the biggest multiplier effect — for every dollar you spend you might get $1.50 worth of demand out there, but necessarily you can’t get all those infrastructure projects done within a two-year time frame and the start-ups may be longer.”

On why there wasn’t as much smart grid funding as he might have liked: One of the things I was pushing for hard was can we get the entire smart grid done, and it turns out that actually, historically, a lot of these lines are laid by private companies, so we couldn’t spend as much as you would think on that part of infrastructure, but we have kick-stared it in the package.

(more…)

Take Away All Dick Fuld’s Money — Use It To Buy Streetcars

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009

fuld-streetcar2

A clawback, as you probably know but many of your fellow Americans do not, is the repossession of a reward that should never have been bestowed in the first place. It’s something of buzzword these days since the financial wizards who gutted the world economy by selling lots of phony paper and taking on absurd risk are still very rich even while their firms are living on taxpayer money.

In televisionland, pundits tend to shake their head sadly and say it’s too late to do anything about the exorbitant bonuses paid out to Dick Fuld and his ilk. But if America is going to be the sort of country that can look itself in the mirror (so to speak) in coming years, that money needs to be clawed back. It’s arguably well within Congress’s power to do so, and it would probably be their most popular action in years. In the best of all worlds the seized loot would go into a special coffer and be spent on something optimistic and socially productive–something with symbolic value.

We’d like to suggest streetcars. They’re just fantastic–an aesthetically brilliant 19th century technology poised for a 21st century comeback. They reduce congestion and pollution and are potent investments in local revitalization. Portland, Oregon, spent $100 million on it’s streetcar network and reaped massive local economic benefits–more than $2.5 billion, according to some calculations. Little Rock has enjoyed similarly robust results. Under the shadow of the reckless newfangled “financial innovation” that laid our economy low, the streetcar speaks to a rather more sensible way of doing things. Not surprisingly, dozens of American cities want in on the action.

To kick the process off then, here are some suggested pairings of fallen financial titans and proposed streetcar projects they could fund with what’s left of their ill-gotten gains. So, come on, Congress – clawbacks for street cars. Ding, ding, ding!

CASE #1

Joe Cassano - While taking in at least $280 million in personal income since 2000 as the head of the AIG division that sunk the parent company, Cassano and friends have cost the taxpayer $120 billion and counting.

and

Robert Rubin - The mastermind behind Citibank’s risk strategy (as well as a key player in the Clinton administration decision to loosen essentially drop all regulation of financial derivatives) certainly has at least a $100 million he can kick in, even after his millions of shares in Citi have fallen into the low single digits.

Can buy streetcars for:

Tuscon - estimated cost of $70 million  (see artist’s rendition of this proposed line in the video below the jump)

(more…)

Does America Still Have a Nuclear Industry?

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009

nuclearstationThe nuclear industry was born in America. But today while it’s booming in the rest of world, it seems to be dying here.

In the halcyon days of the ’60s and ’70s, the three largest builders of reactors were all U.S. companies. Today, there is only GE and it is starting to lag far behind foreign rivals. Since last November, Exelon, the nation’s largest nuclear fleet owner, and Dominion, one of the most ambitious utilities in applying for new reactors, both announced they will drop plans to build GE reactors. Around the same time, Entergy, the nation’s second largest fleet owner, said it will “explore alternatives” to building with GE.

This means that GE, which was already running in third place behind Westinghouse, now a Japanese company, and Areva, the French giant, is down to one planned reactor.

How did we fall so far so fast? It’s actually been decades in the making.

(more…)

Angry Lady Doesn’t Care She’s in a Beautful Airport

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009

Our newest YouTube uber-celebrity coined her fame by throwing the most amazing hissy fit ever over a travel delay. It took place in the Hong Kong International Airport, which has been praised by NY Times columnist Thomas Friedman as the sort of place that makes one embarrassed about the state of America’s airports:

Landing at Kennedy Airport from Hong Kong was, as I’ve argued before, like going from the Jetsons to the Flintstones. The ugly, low-ceilinged arrival hall was cramped, and using a luggage cart cost $3. (Couldn’t we Americans at least supply foreign visitors with a free luggage cart, like other major airports in the world?) As I looked around at this dingy room, it reminded of somewhere I had been before. Then I remembered: It was the luggage hall in the old Hong Kong Kai Tak Airport. It closed in 1998.

So consider it proof that the majestic and vastly superior air travel facilities in Asia are not quite enough to keep everybody calmly inspired during their journey.

Who knows, in a miserable depressing warren of an airport like Kennedy, she might have just shrugged and glumly accepted her fate.

All Aboard the “Fancy Gambling Train”! (Or Not)

Friday, February 13th, 2009

disney2

Somehow $8 billion in funding for high-speed rail dropped like mana from heaven into the stimulus bill this week. Transportation nerds were agog and overjoyed. Then came the “news” today that it was all going to go to pay for, as a PAC headed up by Jim DeMint (R, S.C.) described it, a “Fancy Gambling Train” running from Hollywood (and DisneyLand) to Las Vegas.

This narrative had the virtue of being quite amusing and the vice of being total horseshit. The still theoretical Vegas train project might or might not get any funding, and almost certainly wouldn’t get a large part of it–as, say, the California High Speed Rail project might, or the midwestern equivalent.

“It’s not even a designated high speed rail corridor,” an expert at one of those high-falutin’ DC think tanks tells us. (But, then again, that might not actually prevent funding because “high-speed rail” is a loosey-goosey term.)

The question remains though: Where did the money come from? Was it Reid who put it in there so he could accomplish his nefarious plan of spending hard-earned taxpayer money to allow liberal moneybags like David Geffen and Barbara Streisand to a have plush and politically correct way to take weekenders at the Bellagio?

(more…)