The fraternal duo that gave us Barton Fink and Fargo is now lending a hand to the effort to debunk “clean coal” technology. In this spot by Joel and Ethan Coen, a lovely family gets fooled by a slick-talking salesman into freshening the air in their idyllic home by spraying it with black coal dust. Take that, “clean” hucksters!
Apart from being vaguely amusing, it’s also generally accurate. Which is to say, coal should be actively shunned as part of our national energy strategy. As the world’s leading climate expert put it recently, coal-fired power plants are “death factories.”
Unfortunately, Obama is still on board with clean coal. Why? Coal’s a huge part of the energy pie and has so many interest groups behind it, that it would take a huge act of political courage to say what needs to be said on the subject. For a while there was even a $2 billion trial project in his home state that might have inclined him to believe the hype, although that seems to have been dropped.
The real answer is two-fold. First, to build out our renewable capacity, particularly wind and solar. And second, to become more like France by replacing coal with nuclear. As a nation, we seem to be engaged with the first challenge, but totally ignorant of the second. It would be interesting to see a major Hollywood director take on the latter, politically trickier issue.

The Governator was the star panelist in a discussion last weekend in the National Governors Conference about the infrastructure crisis. It was generally a smart and useful chat. (We’ve got more to say about it, in fact — stay tuned). But this moment really jumped out at us:
Felix Rohatyn, the financier who 


On CNBC yesterday Jim Cramer went on a rant about why bank nationalization is a bad idea. Executive summary: “The government can’t run anything!” Example A: “Look at Amtrak!”



The nuclear industry was born in America. But today while it’s booming in the rest of world, it seems to be dying here.






Why the Vehicle-Miles Traveled Tax Is Getting Short Changed
Tuesday, February 24th, 2009Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood’s suggestion last week that the nation consider adopting fees based on mileage driven (sometimes referred to as vehicle miles traveled, or VMT, fees) was brushed aside too quickly. While substantive issues remain, there is no reason to throw the baby out with the bath water.
This worthy idea is part of the long term future of transportation finance in this country. It would use satellite tracking devices to record how far and when motorists drive and would assess a fee based on those travel habits. Benefits include better allocation of revenues (based on the roads used), better allocation of costs (vehicles damaging to infrastructure such as heavy trucks could be assessed at a greater fee), and better allocation of resources (higher fees could be charged based on time of day and congestion levels).
(more…)
Tags: GUEST COMMENTARY
Posted in Uncategorized | 11 Comments »